Same flavours, different taste buds: a theory for predicting social norms for specific behaviours across cultures

Behavioural norms vary across cultures, and they vary in distinct ways for different behaviours. We show that this variation is not random but highly predictable. We introduce the Moral Flavours Model, a theory proposing that norms emerge from three factors: how much moral concern a behaviour evokes overall, its 'moral flavour' (the type of concern it evokes), and societies' 'moral tastes' (their sensitivity to different types of concern). We demonstrate that this simple framework predicts 76% of the variance in moral norms across 19 morally contentious behaviours in 42 societies, and 88% of the variance in everyday norms across 150 situated behaviours in 90 societies. Remarkably, the same societal tastes predict both profound moral issues (like euthanasia) and mundane behaviours (e.g. whether it is okay to sing on a bus). These fundamental tastes therefore have the potential to predict a society's entire normative landscape. By establishing a high-performance, quantitative theory of cultural variation, this work provides both a powerful predictive tool and new insights into how culture shapes human judgement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2025.1122
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Same flavours, different taste buds: a theory for predicting social norms for specific behaviours across cultures

Brent Simpson, Irina Vartanova, Pontus Strimling, Kimmo Eriksson
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Same flavours, different taste buds: a theory for predicting social norms for specific behaviours across cultures

Brent Simpson, Irina Vartanova, Pontus Strimling, Kimmo Eriksson
article en

Abstract

Behavioural norms vary across cultures, and they vary in distinct ways for different behaviours. We show that this variation is not random but highly predictable. We introduce the Moral Flavours Model, a theory proposing that norms emerge from three factors: how much moral concern a behaviour evokes overall, its 'moral flavour' (the type of concern it evokes), and societies' 'moral tastes' (their sensitivity to different types of concern). We demonstrate that this simple framework predicts 76% of the variance in moral norms across 19 morally contentious behaviours in 42 societies, and 88% of the variance in everyday norms across 150 situated behaviours in 90 societies. Remarkably, the same societal tastes predict both profound moral issues (like euthanasia) and mundane behaviours (e.g. whether it is okay to sing on a bus). These fundamental tastes therefore have the potential to predict a society's entire normative landscape. By establishing a high-performance, quantitative theory of cultural variation, this work provides both a powerful predictive tool and new insights into how culture shapes human judgement.

Journal of The Royal Society InterfaceVol. 23(237)
Linköping University (SE), Uppsala University (SE), University of South Carolina (US), Institute for Futures Studies (SE), Futures Group (United States) (US), Mälardalen University (SE)
Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.