Does Electrical Stimulation Therapy Influence Synkinesis in Facial Paralysis? A Systematic Review

Objective: Facial paralysis (FP) has aesthetic, social, and functional consequences. While electrical stimulation (ES) shows promise for peripheral nerve injury, its role in FP remains controversial due to concerns about increasing synkinesis. Data Sources: A literature review was conducted using Medline/PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Review Methods: Included studies evaluated the incidence or severity of synkinesis after ES in FP patients. Extracted data included demographics, ES parameters, FP etiology, synkinesis outcomes, and treatment duration. Results: Of 601 identified articles, 6 met inclusion criteria, comprising 243 patients (92 female, reported in 5 studies). Bell's palsy was the most common FP etiology (76.5%), followed by iatrogenic facial nerve injury (20.2%). Time to treatment ranged from 1 week to 7 years post-onset. Treatment durations varied from 2 weeks to 29 months, with inter-impulse gaps of 30 to 3000 milliseconds, phase durations of 10 to 700 milliseconds, and amplitudes of 0.5 to 27 mA. All ES was transcutaneous. Three of 5 studies reported no differences in synkinesis scores between ES and control groups. Two studies found no differences in synkinesis incidence. Only one study showed reduced synkinesis in the ES group. Conclusions: This study represents an up-to-date review of synkinesis in FP patients receiving ES. Evidence suggests a benefit in overall facial function for patients without significant additional risk of synkinesis. Inconsistencies in synkinesis outcomes and measurement underscore the need for further research in this area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OTO Open
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70231
Primary Topic
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Electrical Stimulation Therapy Influence Synkinesis in Facial Paralysis? A Systematic Review

F. Jeffrey Lorenz, Hänel W. Eberly, Heather K. Schopper, Jessyka G. Lighthall et al.
OTO Open
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
article

Does Electrical Stimulation Therapy Influence Synkinesis in Facial Paralysis? A Systematic Review

F. Jeffrey Lorenz, Hänel W. Eberly, Heather K. Schopper, Jessyka G. Lighthall, Marly Aziz
article en

Abstract

Objective: Facial paralysis (FP) has aesthetic, social, and functional consequences. While electrical stimulation (ES) shows promise for peripheral nerve injury, its role in FP remains controversial due to concerns about increasing synkinesis. Data Sources: A literature review was conducted using Medline/PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Review Methods: Included studies evaluated the incidence or severity of synkinesis after ES in FP patients. Extracted data included demographics, ES parameters, FP etiology, synkinesis outcomes, and treatment duration. Results: Of 601 identified articles, 6 met inclusion criteria, comprising 243 patients (92 female, reported in 5 studies). Bell's palsy was the most common FP etiology (76.5%), followed by iatrogenic facial nerve injury (20.2%). Time to treatment ranged from 1 week to 7 years post-onset. Treatment durations varied from 2 weeks to 29 months, with inter-impulse gaps of 30 to 3000 milliseconds, phase durations of 10 to 700 milliseconds, and amplitudes of 0.5 to 27 mA. All ES was transcutaneous. Three of 5 studies reported no differences in synkinesis scores between ES and control groups. Two studies found no differences in synkinesis incidence. Only one study showed reduced synkinesis in the ES group. Conclusions: This study represents an up-to-date review of synkinesis in FP patients receiving ES. Evidence suggests a benefit in overall facial function for patients without significant additional risk of synkinesis. Inconsistencies in synkinesis outcomes and measurement underscore the need for further research in this area.

OTO OpenVol. 10(2)
Yale University (US), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.