Managing system realignment through strategic coordination: A case study of multimorbidity in a Norwegian hospital

Healthcare systems are increasingly challenged by multimorbid patient trajectories that cut across specialized, siloed units, which introduces significant complexity that demands highly coordinated, adaptive efforts. By framing hospitals as open, multiunit systems, this study addresses how organizational units strategically realign themselves to manage system complexity in multimorbid healthcare delivery. A single-case study was conducted at a Norwegian university hospital. Using a qualitative multimethod approach, data were collected and analyzed by applying an extended case method scoped by patient trajectories (PTs) involving care and social services for children with concurrent somatic and mental health conditions. The study identified two overarching, complementary coordination strategies: (i) building internal coordination capability—through lateral relationships, the colocation of multidisciplinary staff, and digital interfaces—and (ii) limiting exposure to complexity—via trajectory modulation, dynamic resource allocation, and the selective buffering of cases. Rather than implementing these strategies in isolation, organizational units blended them into a dual strategic approach that was continuously adjusted to local resource constraints, professional discretion, and evolving patient needs. This duality yielded not only intended efficiencies, such as faster clinical decision-making and improved access, but also unintended vulnerabilities, including coordination overload or fragmentation, inequitable access, and the displacement of complexity to families or external providers. This study concludes that in complex healthcare systems, coordination is a strategic—not merely operational—imperative, for which managers must balance flexibility and control by actively designing interfaces that absorb variability without fragmenting care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2026.100768
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing system realignment through strategic coordination: A case study of multimorbidity in a Norwegian hospital

Johanna Torres-Bonilla, Poul Houman Andersen, Heidi C. Dreyer
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Managing system realignment through strategic coordination: A case study of multimorbidity in a Norwegian hospital

Johanna Torres-Bonilla, Poul Houman Andersen, Heidi C. Dreyer
article en

Abstract

Healthcare systems are increasingly challenged by multimorbid patient trajectories that cut across specialized, siloed units, which introduces significant complexity that demands highly coordinated, adaptive efforts. By framing hospitals as open, multiunit systems, this study addresses how organizational units strategically realign themselves to manage system complexity in multimorbid healthcare delivery. A single-case study was conducted at a Norwegian university hospital. Using a qualitative multimethod approach, data were collected and analyzed by applying an extended case method scoped by patient trajectories (PTs) involving care and social services for children with concurrent somatic and mental health conditions. The study identified two overarching, complementary coordination strategies: (i) building internal coordination capability—through lateral relationships, the colocation of multidisciplinary staff, and digital interfaces—and (ii) limiting exposure to complexity—via trajectory modulation, dynamic resource allocation, and the selective buffering of cases. Rather than implementing these strategies in isolation, organizational units blended them into a dual strategic approach that was continuously adjusted to local resource constraints, professional discretion, and evolving patient needs. This duality yielded not only intended efficiencies, such as faster clinical decision-making and improved access, but also unintended vulnerabilities, including coordination overload or fragmentation, inequitable access, and the displacement of complexity to families or external providers. This study concludes that in complex healthcare systems, coordination is a strategic—not merely operational—imperative, for which managers must balance flexibility and control by actively designing interfaces that absorb variability without fragmenting care.

SSM - Qualitative Research in HealthVol. 9
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.