Bridging the immunisation gap: socioeconomic and geographic drivers of pediatric immunisation disparities between different Indian states

Immunising children saves 2–3 million lives every year, making it one of the most effective public health interventions. India’s childhood immunisation rates are steadily improving, but there are still significant differences between states. Tamil Nadu consistently has one of the highest rates of child immunisation, while Nagaland is below the national average. If we figure out the socioeconomic factors that contribute to this difference, we can guide context-specific strategies to improve coverage. To compare the level and socioeconomic and geographic determinants of full immunisation coverage among children aged 12–23 months in Tamil Nadu and Nagaland using data from the fifth National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019-21). A survey-weighted cross-sectional analysis was performed on 1851 children (Tamil Nadu: 1291; Nagaland: 560). To be fully immunised, a child had to receive BCG, three doses of DPT, three doses of OPV, and one dose of MCV. Weighted bivariate chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between full Immunisation and socioeconomic, demographic, and geographic characteristics. We performed sensitivity analysis by restricting to only children who possessed vaccination cards, to assess the robustness of our findings. Immunisation coverage was higher in Tamil Nadu (89.2%) than in Nagaland (57.9%). In bivariate analysis, maternal education was significantly associated with full Immunisation in both states, while wealth, residence, distance to health facility, and birth order were additionally significant in Nagaland, and residence and religion in Tamil Nadu.In multivariable analysis, maternal education remained the most consistent predictor in Nagaland (AOR=2.61; p=0.003) and Tamil Nadu (AOR=2.32; p=0.029). In Nagaland, distance to health facility was also significant (p=0.034), whereas in Tamil Nadu, urban residence (AOR=1.83; p=0.008) and religion (AOR=4.00; p=0.003) were associated with Immunisation status. Other variables were not significant after adjustment. The main factors for the differences in immunisation coverage between states are gaps in maternal education and access to healthcare. To increase vaccination coverage in states with lower coverage, it is crucial to enhance women's education, extend outreach to rural populations, and address socioeconomic barriers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pediatrics
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-026-06822-6
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the immunisation gap: socioeconomic and geographic drivers of pediatric immunisation disparities between different Indian states

Gladius Jennifer Hirudayaraj, Samadou Tchakondo, Richard Sagacity Tugbeh, Komi Selassi Gayi et al.
BMC Pediatrics
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Bridging the immunisation gap: socioeconomic and geographic drivers of pediatric immunisation disparities between different Indian states

Gladius Jennifer Hirudayaraj, Samadou Tchakondo, Richard Sagacity Tugbeh, Komi Selassi Gayi, Ayao Sangénis Assogba, Yendouname Kandjoni, Kezia Angeline J
article en

Abstract

Immunising children saves 2–3 million lives every year, making it one of the most effective public health interventions. India’s childhood immunisation rates are steadily improving, but there are still significant differences between states. Tamil Nadu consistently has one of the highest rates of child immunisation, while Nagaland is below the national average. If we figure out the socioeconomic factors that contribute to this difference, we can guide context-specific strategies to improve coverage. To compare the level and socioeconomic and geographic determinants of full immunisation coverage among children aged 12–23 months in Tamil Nadu and Nagaland using data from the fifth National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019-21). A survey-weighted cross-sectional analysis was performed on 1851 children (Tamil Nadu: 1291; Nagaland: 560). To be fully immunised, a child had to receive BCG, three doses of DPT, three doses of OPV, and one dose of MCV. Weighted bivariate chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between full Immunisation and socioeconomic, demographic, and geographic characteristics. We performed sensitivity analysis by restricting to only children who possessed vaccination cards, to assess the robustness of our findings. Immunisation coverage was higher in Tamil Nadu (89.2%) than in Nagaland (57.9%). In bivariate analysis, maternal education was significantly associated with full Immunisation in both states, while wealth, residence, distance to health facility, and birth order were additionally significant in Nagaland, and residence and religion in Tamil Nadu.In multivariable analysis, maternal education remained the most consistent predictor in Nagaland (AOR=2.61; p=0.003) and Tamil Nadu (AOR=2.32; p=0.029). In Nagaland, distance to health facility was also significant (p=0.034), whereas in Tamil Nadu, urban residence (AOR=1.83; p=0.008) and religion (AOR=4.00; p=0.003) were associated with Immunisation status. Other variables were not significant after adjustment. The main factors for the differences in immunisation coverage between states are gaps in maternal education and access to healthcare. To increase vaccination coverage in states with lower coverage, it is crucial to enhance women's education, extend outreach to rural populations, and address socioeconomic barriers.

BMC Pediatrics
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN), University of Lomé (TG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.