Stent or stoma as a bridge to surgery in patients with acute malignant colorectal obstruction: a comparison of oncologic long-term results

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term oncologic results in patients treated for malignant left-sided colorectal obstruction with colonic stent or a deviating stoma as bridge to surgery. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study comparing survival between 24 patients treated with stents for acute left-sided malignant obstruction and 32 patients who underwent a diverting stoma from 2003 to 2014. All patients subsequently underwent resection surgery with curative intent. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding age, sex, ASA classification, adjuvant chemotherapy, or tumor stage. Median time from acute treatment of obstruction to resection surgery was 30 days in the stent group and 55 days in the stoma group. There were no differences in 30-day complications between the two groups, neither for complications related to the stent or stoma intervention nor for overall complications. Stent-related perforation rate was 1/24 (4.2%). The cumulative 5-year overall survival was 63% in patients treated with a stent and 77% in patients treated with a stoma (p = 0.319). There were two cases of local recurrence in each group (p = 1.0). Conclusions: We found no differences in short-term complications or long-term oncologic outcomes between the two treatment groups. However, this may be due to a type II error, and larger studies are needed to confirm these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1777147
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stent or stoma as a bridge to surgery in patients with acute malignant colorectal obstruction: a comparison of oncologic long-term results

Johannes Asplund, Göran Heinius, Asa Hallqvist Everhov, Isalee Jallow Göransson et al.
Frontiers in Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Stent or stoma as a bridge to surgery in patients with acute malignant colorectal obstruction: a comparison of oncologic long-term results

Johannes Asplund, Göran Heinius, Asa Hallqvist Everhov, Isalee Jallow Göransson, Vanessa Sandblom
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term oncologic results in patients treated for malignant left-sided colorectal obstruction with colonic stent or a deviating stoma as bridge to surgery. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study comparing survival between 24 patients treated with stents for acute left-sided malignant obstruction and 32 patients who underwent a diverting stoma from 2003 to 2014. All patients subsequently underwent resection surgery with curative intent. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding age, sex, ASA classification, adjuvant chemotherapy, or tumor stage. Median time from acute treatment of obstruction to resection surgery was 30 days in the stent group and 55 days in the stoma group. There were no differences in 30-day complications between the two groups, neither for complications related to the stent or stoma intervention nor for overall complications. Stent-related perforation rate was 1/24 (4.2%). The cumulative 5-year overall survival was 63% in patients treated with a stent and 77% in patients treated with a stoma (p = 0.319). There were two cases of local recurrence in each group (p = 1.0). Conclusions: We found no differences in short-term complications or long-term oncologic outcomes between the two treatment groups. However, this may be due to a type II error, and larger studies are needed to confirm these results.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
Stockholm South General Hospital (SE)
Bengt Ihres Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.