Glacier dynamics, proglacial lake expansion, and GLOF risk assessment in the lato basin, Trans-Himalayan Ladakh

The accelerating retreat of glaciers and expansion of glacial lakes in the Trans-Himalayan region of Ladakh are intensifying the risk of Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs), posing significant threats to vulnerable downstream communities. However, high-altitude basins like Lato remain poorly assessed in terms of integrated glacier–lake dynamics and hazard potential. In this study, we present a detailed, multi-parameter assessment of the Lato glacier–lake system over a 40-year period (1980–2020), combining remote sensing, empirical modeling, and hydrodynamic simulations. Our results show an ∼11.5% reduction in glacier area, a mean terminus retreat of ∼171 m at the rate of 4.2 m yr -1 , and a decline in total ice volume from 0.48 km 3 to 0.41 km 3 (1980–2020). Glacier surface velocities, derived using Glacier Image Velocimetry (GIV), ranged from 0.97 to 15.73 m yr -1 , with mean values between 7.63 and 8.03 m yr -1 . Ice thickness was estimated using GlabTop2 and ensemble modeling approaches, yielding average thicknesses of 76 m and 58 m, respectively. Geodetic mass balance calculations indicate a persistent negative trend, with an average loss of −0.33 m w.e. yr -1 since the early 2000s. The proglacial Lato lake expanded by ∼66%, reaching 0.088 km 2 in 2020. Lake depth and volume were estimated using multiple empirical models, with the most robust estimate placing the lake volume at 1.47 × 10 6 m 3 . GLOF susceptibility analysis using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) assigned a high-risk index of 0.82 to the lake. Two-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations using HEC-RAS under full and partial breach scenarios forecast peak discharges of 3726 m 3 s -1 and 2309 m 3 s -1 , respectively, with a potential impact zone extending ∼23 km downstream. This study not only identifies Lato lake as a high-risk GLOF site but also offers region-specific recommendations including glacier and lake monitoring, early warning systems, and the integration of GLOF risk into regional planning and disaster preparedness frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Earth Science
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2026.1740374
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glacier dynamics, proglacial lake expansion, and GLOF risk assessment in the lato basin, Trans-Himalayan Ladakh

Syed Towseef Ahmad, Pervez Ahmed, Devendra Shashikant Nagale, Lander Van Tricht et al.
Frontiers in Earth Science
Cryospheric studies and observations
article

Glacier dynamics, proglacial lake expansion, and GLOF risk assessment in the lato basin, Trans-Himalayan Ladakh

Syed Towseef Ahmad, Pervez Ahmed, Devendra Shashikant Nagale, Lander Van Tricht, Hemant Singh, Janhavi Jadhav, Riyaz Ahmad Mir, Divyesh Varade, Rayees Ahmed
article en

Abstract

The accelerating retreat of glaciers and expansion of glacial lakes in the Trans-Himalayan region of Ladakh are intensifying the risk of Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs), posing significant threats to vulnerable downstream communities. However, high-altitude basins like Lato remain poorly assessed in terms of integrated glacier–lake dynamics and hazard potential. In this study, we present a detailed, multi-parameter assessment of the Lato glacier–lake system over a 40-year period (1980–2020), combining remote sensing, empirical modeling, and hydrodynamic simulations. Our results show an ∼11.5% reduction in glacier area, a mean terminus retreat of ∼171 m at the rate of 4.2 m yr -1 , and a decline in total ice volume from 0.48 km 3 to 0.41 km 3 (1980–2020). Glacier surface velocities, derived using Glacier Image Velocimetry (GIV), ranged from 0.97 to 15.73 m yr -1 , with mean values between 7.63 and 8.03 m yr -1 . Ice thickness was estimated using GlabTop2 and ensemble modeling approaches, yielding average thicknesses of 76 m and 58 m, respectively. Geodetic mass balance calculations indicate a persistent negative trend, with an average loss of −0.33 m w.e. yr -1 since the early 2000s. The proglacial Lato lake expanded by ∼66%, reaching 0.088 km 2 in 2020. Lake depth and volume were estimated using multiple empirical models, with the most robust estimate placing the lake volume at 1.47 × 10 6 m 3 . GLOF susceptibility analysis using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) assigned a high-risk index of 0.82 to the lake. Two-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations using HEC-RAS under full and partial breach scenarios forecast peak discharges of 3726 m 3 s -1 and 2309 m 3 s -1 , respectively, with a potential impact zone extending ∼23 km downstream. This study not only identifies Lato lake as a high-risk GLOF site but also offers region-specific recommendations including glacier and lake monitoring, early warning systems, and the integration of GLOF risk into regional planning and disaster preparedness frameworks.

Frontiers in Earth ScienceVol. 14
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Kashmir (IN), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering (CN), Indian Institute of Technology Jammu (IN), National Institute of Hydrology (IN), Institute of Geography of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development (IN), Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.