Effect of Crown Design, Cement Type and Margin Depth on the Removal of Cement Remnants Around Single Implant‐Supported Restorations. An In‐Vitro Study

OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of crown design, cement type, and margin depth on the removal efficiency of residual cement around single implant-supported restorations. METHODS: ). Statistical analyses assessed the effects of the investigated variables on residual cement volume (p < 0.05). RESULTS: ). While crown design alone showed no statistically significant effect, its interaction with cement type was associated with improved cement removal in the cantilever group. CONCLUSION: Crown margin depth emerged as the dominant factor influencing cement removal. Although cement type also affected residual cement, with glass ionomer showing lower values overall, crown design did not provide a consistent advantage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70129
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Crown Design, Cement Type and Margin Depth on the Removal of Cement Remnants Around Single Implant‐Supported Restorations. An In‐Vitro Study

Shaza Bishti, Anne Barbara Rittich, Taşkın Tuna, Stefan Wolfart et al.
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Effect of Crown Design, Cement Type and Margin Depth on the Removal of Cement Remnants Around Single Implant‐Supported Restorations. An In‐Vitro Study

Shaza Bishti, Anne Barbara Rittich, Taşkın Tuna, Stefan Wolfart, Christiane Apeldorn
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of crown design, cement type, and margin depth on the removal efficiency of residual cement around single implant-supported restorations. METHODS: ). Statistical analyses assessed the effects of the investigated variables on residual cement volume (p < 0.05). RESULTS: ). While crown design alone showed no statistically significant effect, its interaction with cement type was associated with improved cement removal in the cantilever group. CONCLUSION: Crown margin depth emerged as the dominant factor influencing cement removal. Although cement type also affected residual cement, with glass ionomer showing lower values overall, crown design did not provide a consistent advantage.

Clinical Oral Implants Research
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.