Comparative evaluation of sweetener-induced changes in cognitive function, neurotransmission, and antioxidant defense mechanisms in Wistar rats

Aim: This study evaluated the comparative effects of commonly consumed artificial and natural sweeteners on cognitive function, neurotransmitter-related enzyme activities, and oxidative stress status in the brains of Wistar rats to elucidate their potential neurotoxic or neuroprotective properties under sub-chronic dietary exposure. Methods: Seventy-two male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to twelve groups and fed composite biscuits formulated with sucrose (15% and 30%), aspartame (3.5% and 7.0%), date sugar (10% and 20%), erythritol (15% and 30%), or stevia (2.5% and 5.0%) for 21 days. Control groups received either a basal diet or plain wheat biscuits. Spatial working memory was assessed using the Y-Maze spontaneous alternation test. Hippocampal tissue was harvested to determine monoamine oxidase (MAO), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) activities, lipid peroxidation (TBARS, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances), reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and antioxidant enzyme activities (superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione-S-transferase (GST), and glutathione peroxidase). Results: Sucrose (15% and 30%) and aspartame (3.5% and 7.0%) significantly reduced spontaneous alternation performance, indicating impaired working memory. Both sucrose and aspartame dosages markedly elevated MAO, AChE, and BChE activities, increased TBARS and ROS levels, and suppressed antioxidant enzyme activities in the hippocampus. In contrast, diets containing date sugar and erythritol preserved cognitive performance and maintained neurochemical and redox homeostasis. Notably, stevia (5.0%) significantly reduced MAO and AChE activities, attenuated oxidative stress markers, and enhanced endogenous antioxidant defenses. Conclusions: Sub-chronic consumption of sucrose and aspartame induces hippocampal neurotransmitter dysregulation and oxidative stress, contributing to cognitive impairment, whereas natural sweeteners, particularly stevia and date sugar, exhibit neuroprotective effects. These findings support the preferential use of natural sweeteners as safer dietary alternatives for maintaining cognitive and neurochemical health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Exploration of Foods and Foodomics
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37349/eff.2026.1010132
Primary Topic
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of sweetener-induced changes in cognitive function, neurotransmission, and antioxidant defense mechanisms in Wistar rats

Ganiyu Oboh, Olamide Wilson Fasakin, Ayokunle Olubode Ademosun, Mosunmola Akinmeji
Exploration of Foods and Foodomics
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
article

Comparative evaluation of sweetener-induced changes in cognitive function, neurotransmission, and antioxidant defense mechanisms in Wistar rats

Ganiyu Oboh, Olamide Wilson Fasakin, Ayokunle Olubode Ademosun, Mosunmola Akinmeji
article en

Abstract

Aim: This study evaluated the comparative effects of commonly consumed artificial and natural sweeteners on cognitive function, neurotransmitter-related enzyme activities, and oxidative stress status in the brains of Wistar rats to elucidate their potential neurotoxic or neuroprotective properties under sub-chronic dietary exposure. Methods: Seventy-two male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to twelve groups and fed composite biscuits formulated with sucrose (15% and 30%), aspartame (3.5% and 7.0%), date sugar (10% and 20%), erythritol (15% and 30%), or stevia (2.5% and 5.0%) for 21 days. Control groups received either a basal diet or plain wheat biscuits. Spatial working memory was assessed using the Y-Maze spontaneous alternation test. Hippocampal tissue was harvested to determine monoamine oxidase (MAO), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) activities, lipid peroxidation (TBARS, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances), reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and antioxidant enzyme activities (superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione-S-transferase (GST), and glutathione peroxidase). Results: Sucrose (15% and 30%) and aspartame (3.5% and 7.0%) significantly reduced spontaneous alternation performance, indicating impaired working memory. Both sucrose and aspartame dosages markedly elevated MAO, AChE, and BChE activities, increased TBARS and ROS levels, and suppressed antioxidant enzyme activities in the hippocampus. In contrast, diets containing date sugar and erythritol preserved cognitive performance and maintained neurochemical and redox homeostasis. Notably, stevia (5.0%) significantly reduced MAO and AChE activities, attenuated oxidative stress markers, and enhanced endogenous antioxidant defenses. Conclusions: Sub-chronic consumption of sucrose and aspartame induces hippocampal neurotransmitter dysregulation and oxidative stress, contributing to cognitive impairment, whereas natural sweeteners, particularly stevia and date sugar, exhibit neuroprotective effects. These findings support the preferential use of natural sweeteners as safer dietary alternatives for maintaining cognitive and neurochemical health.

Exploration of Foods and FoodomicsVol. 4
Federal University of Technology (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.