Long-Term Outcome of No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation for Treating AFP-Positive Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation (NT-RFA) in treating patients with AFP-positive, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a diameter of ≤ 3cm, and to assess its effect on AFP levels. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 245 AFP-positive HCC patients treated with NT-RFA (n=78) and Conventional RFA (C-RFA) (n=167) at our center between 2015 and 2023. The changes of AFP levels were compared. Statistical analysis was conducted on the overall survival(OS), recurrence free survival(RFS), and tumor recurrence status of the two groups at 1 to 5-years post-RFA. Results: The decrease in postoperative AFP levels was significantly greater in the NT-RFA group than that in the C-RFA group (P=0.009), and the postoperative AFP seronegative rate in the NT-RFA group was significantly higher than that in the C-RFA group (P=0.020). The OS rates at 1-, 3-, and 5-years were 100.00%, 71.07%, and 54.07% for NT-RFA group, while 95.21%, 62.06%, and 30.80% for C-RFA group. Significant differences existed between the two groups (P=0.026). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates in the NT-RFA group were 79.49%, 46.36%, and 29.96%, while 65.87%, 30.99%, and 21.20% in the C-RFA group. Significant differences existed between the two groups (P=0.025). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year local tumor progression-free survival (LTP-FS) rates were 89.67%, 83.31%, 81.06% in the NT-RFA group and 79.01%, 64.61%, 63.10% in the C-RFA group. Significant differences existed between the two groups (P=0.002). But there was no significant difference in intrahepatic distant recurrence-free survival (IDR-FS) between the two groups (P=0.819). Conclusion: Compared with C-RFA, NT-RFA treatment for AFP positive HCC ≤ 3cm is more effective in reducing postoperative AFP levels and improving the rate of AFP conversion to negative. Meanwhile, NT-RFA significantly increased RFS and OS. It can replace C-RFA as the primary treatment method for AFP-positive small HCC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/jhc.s603375
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-Term Outcome of No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation for Treating AFP-Positive Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Kuansheng Ma, Mengda Zou, Guodong Wu, Liang Zhang et al.
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Long-Term Outcome of No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation for Treating AFP-Positive Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Kuansheng Ma, Mengda Zou, Guodong Wu, Liang Zhang, Kai Feng, Xia Ou, Qiang Wang
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation (NT-RFA) in treating patients with AFP-positive, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a diameter of ≤ 3cm, and to assess its effect on AFP levels. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 245 AFP-positive HCC patients treated with NT-RFA (n=78) and Conventional RFA (C-RFA) (n=167) at our center between 2015 and 2023. The changes of AFP levels were compared. Statistical analysis was conducted on the overall survival(OS), recurrence free survival(RFS), and tumor recurrence status of the two groups at 1 to 5-years post-RFA. Results: The decrease in postoperative AFP levels was significantly greater in the NT-RFA group than that in the C-RFA group (P=0.009), and the postoperative AFP seronegative rate in the NT-RFA group was significantly higher than that in the C-RFA group (P=0.020). The OS rates at 1-, 3-, and 5-years were 100.00%, 71.07%, and 54.07% for NT-RFA group, while 95.21%, 62.06%, and 30.80% for C-RFA group. Significant differences existed between the two groups (P=0.026). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates in the NT-RFA group were 79.49%, 46.36%, and 29.96%, while 65.87%, 30.99%, and 21.20% in the C-RFA group. Significant differences existed between the two groups (P=0.025). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year local tumor progression-free survival (LTP-FS) rates were 89.67%, 83.31%, 81.06% in the NT-RFA group and 79.01%, 64.61%, 63.10% in the C-RFA group. Significant differences existed between the two groups (P=0.002). But there was no significant difference in intrahepatic distant recurrence-free survival (IDR-FS) between the two groups (P=0.819). Conclusion: Compared with C-RFA, NT-RFA treatment for AFP positive HCC ≤ 3cm is more effective in reducing postoperative AFP levels and improving the rate of AFP conversion to negative. Meanwhile, NT-RFA significantly increased RFS and OS. It can replace C-RFA as the primary treatment method for AFP-positive small HCC.

Journal of Hepatocellular CarcinomaVol. Volume 13
Army Medical University (CN), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Southwest Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Southwest Hospital
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.