Uncertainty-aware benchmarking reveals ambiguous transcripts in mRNA–lncRNA classification

Abstract Background Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have gained significant attention in recent years, yet distinguishing them from protein-coding transcripts remains challenging. Indeed, many lncRNAs share mRNA-like processing and existing sequence-derived signals do not fully capture the coding/non-coding boundary. Recent GENCODE annotation efforts revealed tens of thousands of novel lncRNA sequences as well as the reclassification of some lncRNAs into the protein-coding class, highlighting the need to better characterize transcript features associated with classification uncertainty and errors. Results We performed uncertainty-aware benchmarking by retraining and evaluating eight transcript classifiers under a controlled protocol on a label-stable GENCODE v46–v47 subset. Beyond conventional model evaluation metrics, we quantified inter-tool agreement and entropy-based uncertainty to stratify transcripts into low and high uncertainty groups. Although aggregate performance was high, ~ 45% of transcripts showed inter-tool discordance, particularly among lncRNAs. To expand standard sequence and ORF-derived signals, we incorporated repeat-derived features and non-canonical secondary structure from both mature transcripts and gene bodies. Feature analyses linked low-uncertainty predictions to strong coding-like signals, whereas high-uncertainty profiles exhibited mixed signatures. Alongside classical predictors in global importance analyses, repeat-derived features appeared as main contributors. Conclusions By combining controlled benchmarking with transcript-level agreement and uncertainty stratification, together with extended feature profiling, we identified patterns associated with classifier disagreement and misclassification. This novel framework provides practical guidance for interpreting predictions, motivating the development of more robust coding/non-coding classifiers, while also shedding light on the sequence properties that distinguish lncRNA sequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11362934/v1
Primary Topic
Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Uncertainty-aware benchmarking reveals ambiguous transcripts in mRNA–lncRNA classification

Domitille Chalopin, Kateryna D. Makova, Saswat K. Mohanty, Macha Nikolski et al.
1 links
Research Square
Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
preprint

Uncertainty-aware benchmarking reveals ambiguous transcripts in mRNA–lncRNA classification

Domitille Chalopin, Kateryna D. Makova, Saswat K. Mohanty, Macha Nikolski, Daniel García‐Ruano, Rahma Baaziz, Mikaël Georges
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have gained significant attention in recent years, yet distinguishing them from protein-coding transcripts remains challenging. Indeed, many lncRNAs share mRNA-like processing and existing sequence-derived signals do not fully capture the coding/non-coding boundary. Recent GENCODE annotation efforts revealed tens of thousands of novel lncRNA sequences as well as the reclassification of some lncRNAs into the protein-coding class, highlighting the need to better characterize transcript features associated with classification uncertainty and errors. Results We performed uncertainty-aware benchmarking by retraining and evaluating eight transcript classifiers under a controlled protocol on a label-stable GENCODE v46–v47 subset. Beyond conventional model evaluation metrics, we quantified inter-tool agreement and entropy-based uncertainty to stratify transcripts into low and high uncertainty groups. Although aggregate performance was high, ~ 45% of transcripts showed inter-tool discordance, particularly among lncRNAs. To expand standard sequence and ORF-derived signals, we incorporated repeat-derived features and non-canonical secondary structure from both mature transcripts and gene bodies. Feature analyses linked low-uncertainty predictions to strong coding-like signals, whereas high-uncertainty profiles exhibited mixed signatures. Alongside classical predictors in global importance analyses, repeat-derived features appeared as main contributors. Conclusions By combining controlled benchmarking with transcript-level agreement and uncertainty stratification, together with extended feature profiling, we identified patterns associated with classifier disagreement and misclassification. This novel framework provides practical guidance for interpreting predictions, motivating the development of more robust coding/non-coding classifiers, while also shedding light on the sequence properties that distinguish lncRNA sequences.

Research Square
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Pennsylvania State University (US), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Immunology from Concept and Experiments to Translation (FR), Institut de Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires (FR)
Institut National Du Cancer, National Institutes of Health
Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon