Is there an allegiance bias on the efficacy of systemic therapy? A three-level meta- regression analysis

OBJECTIVE: Allegiance bias affects the reproducibility of psychotherapy outcomes, but its impact in systemic therapy (ST) remains largely unexplored. METHOD: Two meta-analyses were conducted: Study 1 with 42 RCTs (364 effect sizes) for children and adolescents, as well as Study 2 with 30 RCTs (161 effect sizes) for adults. Allegiance was measured using a comprehensive rating scale across researcher, therapist, trainer, and supervisor levels. Furthermore, risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the adapted tool for psychotherapy. Three-level meta-regressions were performed, controlling for dosage. RESULTS: = 42). CONCLUSION: The findings underscore the role of researcher allegiance investigating ST for children and adolescents and RoB in ST for adults, highlighting the need for transparent methods and replication efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2026.2654029
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is there an allegiance bias on the efficacy of systemic therapy? A three-level meta- regression analysis

Niels Braus, Robin Gräfenkämper, Christian Frankman, Johanna Wichmann et al.
Psychotherapy Research
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

Is there an allegiance bias on the efficacy of systemic therapy? A three-level meta- regression analysis

Niels Braus, Robin Gräfenkämper, Christian Frankman, Johanna Wichmann, Christina Hunger‐Schoppe, Christoph Flückiger
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Allegiance bias affects the reproducibility of psychotherapy outcomes, but its impact in systemic therapy (ST) remains largely unexplored. METHOD: Two meta-analyses were conducted: Study 1 with 42 RCTs (364 effect sizes) for children and adolescents, as well as Study 2 with 30 RCTs (161 effect sizes) for adults. Allegiance was measured using a comprehensive rating scale across researcher, therapist, trainer, and supervisor levels. Furthermore, risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the adapted tool for psychotherapy. Three-level meta-regressions were performed, controlling for dosage. RESULTS: = 42). CONCLUSION: The findings underscore the role of researcher allegiance investigating ST for children and adolescents and RoB in ST for adults, highlighting the need for transparent methods and replication efforts.

Psychotherapy Research
University of Kassel (DE), Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is there an allegiance bias on the efficacy of systemic therapy? A three-level meta- regression analysis — Niels Braus, Robin Gräfenkämper, et al. · Psychotherapy Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS