Is there an allegiance bias on the efficacy of systemic therapy? A three-level meta- regression analysis
OBJECTIVE: Allegiance bias affects the reproducibility of psychotherapy outcomes, but its impact in systemic therapy (ST) remains largely unexplored. METHOD: Two meta-analyses were conducted: Study 1 with 42 RCTs (364 effect sizes) for children and adolescents, as well as Study 2 with 30 RCTs (161 effect sizes) for adults. Allegiance was measured using a comprehensive rating scale across researcher, therapist, trainer, and supervisor levels. Furthermore, risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the adapted tool for psychotherapy. Three-level meta-regressions were performed, controlling for dosage. RESULTS: = 42). CONCLUSION: The findings underscore the role of researcher allegiance investigating ST for children and adolescents and RoB in ST for adults, highlighting the need for transparent methods and replication efforts.
Authors
- Niels Braus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5741-2538)
- Robin Gräfenkämper (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9649-8373)
- Christian Frankman
- Johanna Wichmann
- Christina Hunger‐Schoppe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7762-6859)
- Christoph Flückiger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3058-5815)
Institutions
- University of Kassel (DE)
- Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Psychotherapy Research
- Published
- 2026-04-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2026.2654029
- Primary Topic
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00