Do You Think You Own That Game You Just Bought? Think Again: The Degradation of Ownership Rights in the Digital Age

The digital age has redefined ownership, particularly within the video game industry, where End User License Agreements (“EULAs”) and licensing models have eroded traditional consumer rights. This Comment examines how U.S. courts’ broad enforcement of clickwrap and shrinkwrap agreements, combined with evolving monetization models and unilateral contract modification practices, has shifted bargaining power decisively toward game publishers. Using Activision Blizzard’s 2024 EULA as a case study, the Comment illustrates how licensing terms can restrict access, limit legal recourse, and undermine reasonable consumer expectations despite substantial upfront purchases. The Comment then situates these practices within existing consumer protection frameworks and evaluates California Assembly Bill (“AB”) 2624 as a targeted response to deceptive digital ownership representations. While California's AB 2624 is a promising example, this Comment concludes that federal legislation is necessary to address deeper structural deficiencies in digital ownership law, including unilateral contract modifications, inconsistent judicial enforcement, and the lack of standardized disclosures for digital goods and services.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Texas A&M Journal of Property Law
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37419/jpl.v12.i3.7
Primary Topic
Copyright and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do You Think You Own That Game You Just Bought? Think Again: The Degradation of Ownership Rights in the Digital Age

Evan Schoop
Texas A&M Journal of Property Law
Copyright and Intellectual Property
article

Do You Think You Own That Game You Just Bought? Think Again: The Degradation of Ownership Rights in the Digital Age

Evan Schoop
article en

Abstract

The digital age has redefined ownership, particularly within the video game industry, where End User License Agreements (“EULAs”) and licensing models have eroded traditional consumer rights. This Comment examines how U.S. courts’ broad enforcement of clickwrap and shrinkwrap agreements, combined with evolving monetization models and unilateral contract modification practices, has shifted bargaining power decisively toward game publishers. Using Activision Blizzard’s 2024 EULA as a case study, the Comment illustrates how licensing terms can restrict access, limit legal recourse, and undermine reasonable consumer expectations despite substantial upfront purchases. The Comment then situates these practices within existing consumer protection frameworks and evaluates California Assembly Bill (“AB”) 2624 as a targeted response to deceptive digital ownership representations. While California's AB 2624 is a promising example, this Comment concludes that federal legislation is necessary to address deeper structural deficiencies in digital ownership law, including unilateral contract modifications, inconsistent judicial enforcement, and the lack of standardized disclosures for digital goods and services.

Texas A&M Journal of Property LawVol. 12(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Copyright and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.