Widely Adopted Financial Management Practices Under Pressure? State Grant Allocations to Nonprofits in Minnesota

ABSTRACT Nonprofits are commonly advised to minimize overhead, maintain fiscal leanness, diversify revenue streams, and avoid debt. The problem is that adhering to these financial management practices may not always result in positive outcomes; instead, it may lead to unforeseen consequences. Using a unique dataset that consists of 938 organizations from Minnesota, this study examines whether nonprofits adopting the four widely implemented financial management practices are associated with securing larger grant amounts and/or a greater number of government grants. Our analysis results indicate that maintaining fiscal leanness is associated with receiving a greater number of state government grants, and diversifying revenue streams can attract larger amounts of state government funding. However, efforts to minimize overhead and/or avoid debt do not consistently yield comparable funding advantages. Government responses to these financial management practices appear more complex than previously assumed. Our findings have important implications for nonprofit financial management and for government funding decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.70052
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Widely Adopted Financial Management Practices Under Pressure? State Grant Allocations to Nonprofits in Minnesota

H. Bi, Yuan Cheng, Shuyi Deng, ChiaKo Hung
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Widely Adopted Financial Management Practices Under Pressure? State Grant Allocations to Nonprofits in Minnesota

H. Bi, Yuan Cheng, Shuyi Deng, ChiaKo Hung
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nonprofits are commonly advised to minimize overhead, maintain fiscal leanness, diversify revenue streams, and avoid debt. The problem is that adhering to these financial management practices may not always result in positive outcomes; instead, it may lead to unforeseen consequences. Using a unique dataset that consists of 938 organizations from Minnesota, this study examines whether nonprofits adopting the four widely implemented financial management practices are associated with securing larger grant amounts and/or a greater number of government grants. Our analysis results indicate that maintaining fiscal leanness is associated with receiving a greater number of state government grants, and diversifying revenue streams can attract larger amounts of state government funding. However, efforts to minimize overhead and/or avoid debt do not consistently yield comparable funding advantages. Government responses to these financial management practices appear more complex than previously assumed. Our findings have important implications for nonprofit financial management and for government funding decisions.

Nonprofit Management and Leadership
University of Minnesota (US), East China University of Science and Technology (CN), Indiana University Bloomington (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.