Risk of Depression With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists Compared to Other Antidiabetic Medications in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely used for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) due to their metabolic and cardiovascular benefits; however, concerns have emerged regarding potential neuropsychiatric effects, including depression. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and the risk of developing depression in adults with T2DM. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from database inception through April 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing GLP-1 RAs with other antidiabetic therapies. The primary outcome was incident depression. Secondary outcomes included anxiety-related outcomes and reported adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, where appropriate. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Nine studies involving 1,735,325 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which five contributed to the quantitative synthesis. The meta-analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the risk of incident depression between GLP-1 RA users and those receiving other antidiabetic agents (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.97-1.14), with substantial heterogeneity observed (I² = 83.2%). Sensitivity analysis showed that exclusion of one influential study increased the pooled estimate to a statistically significant hazard ratio (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.01-1.19; p = 0.035). Limited evidence suggested potential benefits in anxiety-related outcomes in some studies, although findings were heterogeneous and not amenable to quantitative synthesis. Reported adverse events were predominantly gastrointestinal. Overall, the available evidence suggests that GLP-1 RA use is not associated with an increased risk of depression in adults with type 2 diabetes, though heterogeneity across studies highlights the need for further prospective research with standardized psychiatric outcome assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.106972
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk of Depression With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists Compared to Other Antidiabetic Medications in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jia Ee Chia, Lesly Martinez Artiga, Genesis M Ferrer Zavala, Zuleika Y Morales del Cid et al.
Cureus
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Risk of Depression With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists Compared to Other Antidiabetic Medications in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jia Ee Chia, Lesly Martinez Artiga, Genesis M Ferrer Zavala, Zuleika Y Morales del Cid, Carlos Valladares, Cesar F Caro Rodriguez, Paula Carrion Carrion
article en

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely used for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) due to their metabolic and cardiovascular benefits; however, concerns have emerged regarding potential neuropsychiatric effects, including depression. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and the risk of developing depression in adults with T2DM. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from database inception through April 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing GLP-1 RAs with other antidiabetic therapies. The primary outcome was incident depression. Secondary outcomes included anxiety-related outcomes and reported adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, where appropriate. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Nine studies involving 1,735,325 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which five contributed to the quantitative synthesis. The meta-analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the risk of incident depression between GLP-1 RA users and those receiving other antidiabetic agents (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.97-1.14), with substantial heterogeneity observed (I² = 83.2%). Sensitivity analysis showed that exclusion of one influential study increased the pooled estimate to a statistically significant hazard ratio (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.01-1.19; p = 0.035). Limited evidence suggested potential benefits in anxiety-related outcomes in some studies, although findings were heterogeneous and not amenable to quantitative synthesis. Reported adverse events were predominantly gastrointestinal. Overall, the available evidence suggests that GLP-1 RA use is not associated with an increased risk of depression in adults with type 2 diabetes, though heterogeneity across studies highlights the need for further prospective research with standardized psychiatric outcome assessment.

Cureus
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.