Integrating Multidimensional 3D Spatial Analysis for Quantitative Geological Environment Evaluation in Urban Underground Space Planning

Geological environment evaluation for urban underground space (UGEE) is a critical foundation for optimizing the utilization of urban underground space (UUS) and mitigating exploitation risks. With recent advancements in 3D geological modeling technology, 3D UGEE has emerged as a transformative approach, offering innovative perspectives and technical solutions for rational 3D spatial development and geological risk reduction in subsurface engineering. A core component of the 3D UGEE workflow is the integration of diverse 3D spatial analysis methods, which enable comprehensive extraction of evaluation indices from multidimensional datasets—forming the essential basis for scientifically informed development planning. Focusing on quantitative 3D UGEE, this study systematically investigates the implementation of 3D spatial analysis methods across four key stages: (1) geological condition analysis, (2) evaluation information extraction, (3) 3D comprehensive evaluation, and (4) result analysis. Specifically, five core methodologies are highlighted: (1) 3D spatial statistical analysis, (2) 3D mathematical morphological analysis, (3) 3D surface morphology analysis, (4) 3D spatial distance field analysis, and (5) 3D spatial interpolation analysis. To improve the reliability and objectivity of 3D comprehensive evaluation results, we integrate game theory-based combination weighting with an improved TOPSIS model, which balances the subjectivity of expert judgment and the objectivity of data characteristics while adapting to the 3D block unit data structure, effectively avoiding the bias of single weighting or evaluation models. To validate these techniques, a case study in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, is conducted, demonstrating their practical effectiveness in evaluating UUS resources. The findings underscore that advanced 3D spatial analysis methods significantly enhance decision-making precision in UUS planning and risk management, providing a replicable framework for sustainable subsurface development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosciences
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16040157
Primary Topic
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Multidimensional 3D Spatial Analysis for Quantitative Geological Environment Evaluation in Urban Underground Space Planning

Haijie Yang, Shiying Yang, Hongjie Ma, Huaixue Xing et al.
Geosciences
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
article

Integrating Multidimensional 3D Spatial Analysis for Quantitative Geological Environment Evaluation in Urban Underground Space Planning

Haijie Yang, Shiying Yang, Hongjie Ma, Huaixue Xing, Chaojie Zhen, Yong Hu, Fanfan Dou, Yan Zou
article en

Abstract

Geological environment evaluation for urban underground space (UGEE) is a critical foundation for optimizing the utilization of urban underground space (UUS) and mitigating exploitation risks. With recent advancements in 3D geological modeling technology, 3D UGEE has emerged as a transformative approach, offering innovative perspectives and technical solutions for rational 3D spatial development and geological risk reduction in subsurface engineering. A core component of the 3D UGEE workflow is the integration of diverse 3D spatial analysis methods, which enable comprehensive extraction of evaluation indices from multidimensional datasets—forming the essential basis for scientifically informed development planning. Focusing on quantitative 3D UGEE, this study systematically investigates the implementation of 3D spatial analysis methods across four key stages: (1) geological condition analysis, (2) evaluation information extraction, (3) 3D comprehensive evaluation, and (4) result analysis. Specifically, five core methodologies are highlighted: (1) 3D spatial statistical analysis, (2) 3D mathematical morphological analysis, (3) 3D surface morphology analysis, (4) 3D spatial distance field analysis, and (5) 3D spatial interpolation analysis. To improve the reliability and objectivity of 3D comprehensive evaluation results, we integrate game theory-based combination weighting with an improved TOPSIS model, which balances the subjectivity of expert judgment and the objectivity of data characteristics while adapting to the 3D block unit data structure, effectively avoiding the bias of single weighting or evaluation models. To validate these techniques, a case study in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, is conducted, demonstrating their practical effectiveness in evaluating UUS resources. The findings underscore that advanced 3D spatial analysis methods significantly enhance decision-making precision in UUS planning and risk management, providing a replicable framework for sustainable subsurface development.

GeosciencesVol. 16(4)
Hefei University of Technology (CN), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), Jiangsu Second Normal University (CN), China Geological Survey (CN), Lishui University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.