Environmental Courts and Corporate <scp>ESG</scp> Greenwashing

ABSTRACT Environmental courts serve as a pivotal judicial mechanism for addressing corporate ESG greenwashing. Based on data from China's A‐share listed corporations from 2009 to 2023, this study employs a double machine learning (DML) model to empirically examine the causal effect of environmental courts on corporate ESG greenwashing. The findings indicate that: (1) Environmental courts significantly curb corporate ESG greenwashing, a result that holds across a series of robustness checks. (2) Heterogeneity tests suggest that the inhibitory effect manifests more strongly in large corporations, corporations without political connections, technology‐based corporations, and polluting corporations. (3) Mechanism tests reveal that environmental courts mainly operate through four pathways: refining judicial review standards, strengthening guidance from case precedents, enhancing judicial review capacity, and intensifying judicial accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70207
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Courts and Corporate ESG Greenwashing

Zhonghua Cheng, Yanhao Yang
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Environmental law and policy
article

Environmental Courts and Corporate ESG Greenwashing

Zhonghua Cheng, Yanhao Yang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Environmental courts serve as a pivotal judicial mechanism for addressing corporate ESG greenwashing. Based on data from China's A‐share listed corporations from 2009 to 2023, this study employs a double machine learning (DML) model to empirically examine the causal effect of environmental courts on corporate ESG greenwashing. The findings indicate that: (1) Environmental courts significantly curb corporate ESG greenwashing, a result that holds across a series of robustness checks. (2) Heterogeneity tests suggest that the inhibitory effect manifests more strongly in large corporations, corporations without political connections, technology‐based corporations, and polluting corporations. (3) Mechanism tests reveal that environmental courts mainly operate through four pathways: refining judicial review standards, strengthening guidance from case precedents, enhancing judicial review capacity, and intensifying judicial accountability.

International Journal of Finance & Economics
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.