Long Term Impact of Organic and Inorganic Farming Practices on Productivity and Quality of Sugarcane

A field experiment was conducted during 2014–15 to 2020–21 to evaluate the effect of organic and inorganic farming practices on yield and quality of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with three treatments, viz., control, organic and inorganic farming practices. The pooled analysis of 7 years data revealed that inorganic farming practices significantly influenced growth and yield parameters of sugarcane. Among the treatments, inorganic farming recorded the highest number of millable canes (76.72 ×10³ ha⁻¹), cane yield (85.00 t ha⁻¹) and CCS yield (10.06 t ha⁻¹), which were significantly superior over other treatments. However, organic farming resulted in higher sucrose content (18.05%) and CCS percentage (12.56%), indicating better juice quality. The study also revealed that organic sugarcane farming recorded a lower benefit cost ratio compared to inorganic farming. The higher cost of cultivation in organic farming is mainly attributed to the purchase of organic inputs. However, if farmers are able to produce organic manures on their own farms at minimal or no cost, the overall expenditure can be significantly reduced. Under such conditions, coupled with the premium price often received for organic produce, organic sugarcane cultivation can become economically profitable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2026/v32i44127
Primary Topic
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long Term Impact of Organic and Inorganic Farming Practices on Productivity and Quality of Sugarcane

K. Pavan Chandra Reddy, J. A. Kamalakar, D. Vijaya Lakshmi, T. Prabhakar Reddy
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
article

Long Term Impact of Organic and Inorganic Farming Practices on Productivity and Quality of Sugarcane

K. Pavan Chandra Reddy, J. A. Kamalakar, D. Vijaya Lakshmi, T. Prabhakar Reddy
article en

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2014–15 to 2020–21 to evaluate the effect of organic and inorganic farming practices on yield and quality of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with three treatments, viz., control, organic and inorganic farming practices. The pooled analysis of 7 years data revealed that inorganic farming practices significantly influenced growth and yield parameters of sugarcane. Among the treatments, inorganic farming recorded the highest number of millable canes (76.72 ×10³ ha⁻¹), cane yield (85.00 t ha⁻¹) and CCS yield (10.06 t ha⁻¹), which were significantly superior over other treatments. However, organic farming resulted in higher sucrose content (18.05%) and CCS percentage (12.56%), indicating better juice quality. The study also revealed that organic sugarcane farming recorded a lower benefit cost ratio compared to inorganic farming. The higher cost of cultivation in organic farming is mainly attributed to the purchase of organic inputs. However, if farmers are able to produce organic manures on their own farms at minimal or no cost, the overall expenditure can be significantly reduced. Under such conditions, coupled with the premium price often received for organic produce, organic sugarcane cultivation can become economically profitable.

Journal of Scientific Research and ReportsVol. 32(4)
Indian Institute of Rice Research (IN), Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University (IN), Directorate of Poultry Research (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.