Ability of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction to Preserve Detail and Remove Noise in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Clinical Analysis

PURPOSE: To analyze image quality over 3 levels (low, medium, and high) of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR), evaluate whether edge detail is lost with higher denoising levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen subjects scanned with the institute's clinical coronary CT angiography (CCTA) protocols were retrospectively reconstructed with low, medium, and high levels of DLIR. Two readers assessed image quality on a 5-point Likert scale for structural confidence in relevant structures, low contrast detectability, noise, spatial resolution, artifacts, and overall diagnostic quality. The noise texture of images was also assessed using a non-Likert 5-point scale of "plastic" to "sandy." Reader agreement was assessed with pairwise linearly weighted Cohen Kappa. Objective analysis was performed with contrast-to-noise (CNR) measurements of the aorta, left main artery, and right coronary artery. Friedman and Dunnett tests were used to assess statistical differences in image quality and CNR. To assess detail loss, edge detail preservation was assessed with different images between DLIR levels. RESULTS: Observations of the difference images between DLIR images and the histograms of edge and nonedge pixels demonstrated that negligible edge detail was lost between the DLIR reconstructions. High DLIR CNR was significantly (P≤0.006) higher than low and medium DLIR CNR. Medium DLIR CNR was significantly (P≤0.02) higher than low DLIR CNR. Reader agreement was moderate (κ=0.42). High DLIR scores were significantly superior (P≤0.002) to low DLIR scores for most structural confidence structures, low contrast detectability, noise, spatial resolution, artifacts, and overall diagnostic quality, and significantly superior (P≤0.03) to medium DLIR scores for all categories except spatial resolution (P=0.66). CONCLUSION: By both objective and subjective measures, the higher levels of DLIR resulted in improved image quality without loss of edge details.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000001866
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ability of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction to Preserve Detail and Remove Noise in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Clinical Analysis

Prashant Nagpal, Martin G. Wagner, Sarv Priya, Timothy P. Szczykutowicz et al.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Ability of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction to Preserve Detail and Remove Noise in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Clinical Analysis

Prashant Nagpal, Martin G. Wagner, Sarv Priya, Timothy P. Szczykutowicz, Jakub Siembida, A. M. Salyapongse
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze image quality over 3 levels (low, medium, and high) of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR), evaluate whether edge detail is lost with higher denoising levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen subjects scanned with the institute's clinical coronary CT angiography (CCTA) protocols were retrospectively reconstructed with low, medium, and high levels of DLIR. Two readers assessed image quality on a 5-point Likert scale for structural confidence in relevant structures, low contrast detectability, noise, spatial resolution, artifacts, and overall diagnostic quality. The noise texture of images was also assessed using a non-Likert 5-point scale of "plastic" to "sandy." Reader agreement was assessed with pairwise linearly weighted Cohen Kappa. Objective analysis was performed with contrast-to-noise (CNR) measurements of the aorta, left main artery, and right coronary artery. Friedman and Dunnett tests were used to assess statistical differences in image quality and CNR. To assess detail loss, edge detail preservation was assessed with different images between DLIR levels. RESULTS: Observations of the difference images between DLIR images and the histograms of edge and nonedge pixels demonstrated that negligible edge detail was lost between the DLIR reconstructions. High DLIR CNR was significantly (P≤0.006) higher than low and medium DLIR CNR. Medium DLIR CNR was significantly (P≤0.02) higher than low DLIR CNR. Reader agreement was moderate (κ=0.42). High DLIR scores were significantly superior (P≤0.002) to low DLIR scores for most structural confidence structures, low contrast detectability, noise, spatial resolution, artifacts, and overall diagnostic quality, and significantly superior (P≤0.03) to medium DLIR scores for all categories except spatial resolution (P=0.66). CONCLUSION: By both objective and subjective measures, the higher levels of DLIR resulted in improved image quality without loss of edge details.

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Laboratoire d’Imagerie Biomédicale (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.