Corrigendum: Bridging the gap between procedural and relational ethics in qualitative research: insights from the ethics review process

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article Nazir O, Khan M, Sayers J (2026), “Bridging the gap between procedural and relational ethics in qualitative research: insights from the ethics review process”. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, Vol. 21 No. 5 pp. 19–42, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-11-2024-2875, published Appendixes B and C with an ethics notification number that was intended to remain anonymised. This is now corrected and the anonymised version has been updated online. The revised appendix can be found below.The publisher asks that Appendix be provided correctly at submission and confirmed at article proofing stage.Approval of the application was declined for the following reasons (First Decision Letter):A substantially revised application may be submitted for reconsideration.Choosing “Yes” on any of these questions means a full ethics approval process is needed.Does your research include:Researchers may also choose the full approval route for education and training purposes.