Clinical benefit of invasive vagus nerve stimulation in intractable epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Intractable or drug-resistant epilepsy is a condition in which seizures cannot be adequately controlled with antiepileptic medications. When resective surgery is not feasible or ineffective, neuromodulation therapy, such as the vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), represents a safe and approved treatment alternative. Nonetheless, the extent of its clinical benefit remains incompletely characterized. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the clinical benefit and treatment response of invasive VNS in reducing seizure frequency among patients with intractable epilepsy. Results Four databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase/Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases) were searched from database inception through November 2024. Data analysis was performed with Review Manager (RevMan 5.4), using a random-effect model based on heterogeneity. Five cohort studies (three prospective and two retrospective) were included in the quantitative analysis, involving 244 participants with intractable epilepsy. The pooled analysis revealed a statistically significant association between VNS and reduced seizure occurrence compared with baseline (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.36–0.91). Adverse events, reported in three studies, were generally mild to moderate. Two studies assessing the relationship between seizure type and VNS response consistently demonstrated a more favorable response in patients with generalized epilepsy. One study reported a positive response to VNS therapy in patients with prior surgery in the focal resection group (> 60%), followed by corpus callosotomy (33%). However, none of the studies reported a significant reduction in antiseizure medication use following VNS therapy. Conclusion VNS was associated with reduced seizure occurrence in patients with intractable epilepsy, supporting its potential role as a neuromodulatory treatment option, notably in generalized epilepsy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-026-01155-8
Primary Topic
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical benefit of invasive vagus nerve stimulation in intractable epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kennytha Yoesdyanto, Made Agus Mahendra Inggas, P. Wirajaya, Nathan Muliawan et al.
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
article

Clinical benefit of invasive vagus nerve stimulation in intractable epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kennytha Yoesdyanto, Made Agus Mahendra Inggas, P. Wirajaya, Nathan Muliawan, Edeline Samudra
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Intractable or drug-resistant epilepsy is a condition in which seizures cannot be adequately controlled with antiepileptic medications. When resective surgery is not feasible or ineffective, neuromodulation therapy, such as the vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), represents a safe and approved treatment alternative. Nonetheless, the extent of its clinical benefit remains incompletely characterized. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the clinical benefit and treatment response of invasive VNS in reducing seizure frequency among patients with intractable epilepsy. Results Four databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase/Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases) were searched from database inception through November 2024. Data analysis was performed with Review Manager (RevMan 5.4), using a random-effect model based on heterogeneity. Five cohort studies (three prospective and two retrospective) were included in the quantitative analysis, involving 244 participants with intractable epilepsy. The pooled analysis revealed a statistically significant association between VNS and reduced seizure occurrence compared with baseline (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.36–0.91). Adverse events, reported in three studies, were generally mild to moderate. Two studies assessing the relationship between seizure type and VNS response consistently demonstrated a more favorable response in patients with generalized epilepsy. One study reported a positive response to VNS therapy in patients with prior surgery in the focal resection group (> 60%), followed by corpus callosotomy (33%). However, none of the studies reported a significant reduction in antiseizure medication use following VNS therapy. Conclusion VNS was associated with reduced seizure occurrence in patients with intractable epilepsy, supporting its potential role as a neuromodulatory treatment option, notably in generalized epilepsy.

The Egyptian Journal of Neurology Psychiatry and NeurosurgeryVol. 62(1)
Pelita Harapan University (ID), Siloam Eye Hospital (KR)
Universitas Pelita Harapan
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.