Energy efficiency, carbon footprint, and profitability of winter wheat under different production types and cultivation patterns: A 12-year field study

Sustainable grain production in the North China Plain (NCP) faces persistent yield–environment trade-offs. High–low seedbed cultivation (HLSC) offers yield benefits, yet long-term field evidence integrating energy, environmental, and economic performance across different production organizations remains limited. Here, a 12-year field experiment was conducted to evaluate four wheat production systems formed by the combination of two production types (cooperative vs. smallholder farming) and two cultivation patterns (HLSC vs. flat cultivation, FC). Grain yield, energy budgets, carbon footprint, soil carbon sequestration, and economic performance were assessed to quantify system-level sustainability outcomes. Results showed that cooperative farming combined with high-low seedbed cultivation (C-HLSC) consistently outperformed other treatments across multiple sustainability dimensions. Compared with the smallholder with flat cultivation (S-FC), C-HLSC increased grain yield by 12.1% and net income by 67.7%, while achieving the only benefit–cost ratio exceeding unity (1.06). Despite relatively low energy input (29.23 GJ ha -1 ), C-HLSC produced the highest net energy output (269.6 GJ ha -1 ), resulting in superior energy-use efficiency (10.3) and energy productivity (0.31 kg MJ -1 ). Simultaneously, carbon performance improved markedly, with the lowest grain-scaled carbon footprint (0.66 kg CE kg -1 ) and the greatest annual soil organic carbon sequestration (698.0 kg CO 2 -eq ha -1 ). These improvements indicate that enhanced productivity diluted energy and carbon intensity while coordinated farm management improved operational efficiency and economic returns. Overall, the C-HLSC pattern therefore represents a practical pathway for advancing energy-efficient and low-carbon wheat production, providing empirical support for policies promoting cooperative farming and resource-efficient cultivation strategies in the NCP and comparable agroecosystems worldwide. • A long-term field experiment was conducted to assess yield, energy and carbon budgeting under different production type and cultivation pattern. • Cooperative farming increased 3.4% grain yield, 15.1% energy use efficiency, and 39.8% net return, while decreased 5.5% carbon footprint. • High-low seedbed cultivation increased 8.2% grain yield and 19.9% net return, while decreased 9.7% carbon footprint. • Cooperative combined with high-low seedbed cultivation achieved highest energy use efficiency and economic benefit, together with the lowest carbon footprint.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2026.141029
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy efficiency, carbon footprint, and profitability of winter wheat under different production types and cultivation patterns: A 12-year field study

Zhuanyun Si, Sunusi Amin Abubakar, Bingcheng Si, Huijie LI et al.
Energy
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Energy efficiency, carbon footprint, and profitability of winter wheat under different production types and cultivation patterns: A 12-year field study

Zhuanyun Si, Sunusi Amin Abubakar, Bingcheng Si, Huijie LI, Sen Li, Fangzhi Duan, Guangshuai Wang, Tao Zhou, Shuang Li, Qianqian Ma
article en

Abstract

Sustainable grain production in the North China Plain (NCP) faces persistent yield–environment trade-offs. High–low seedbed cultivation (HLSC) offers yield benefits, yet long-term field evidence integrating energy, environmental, and economic performance across different production organizations remains limited. Here, a 12-year field experiment was conducted to evaluate four wheat production systems formed by the combination of two production types (cooperative vs. smallholder farming) and two cultivation patterns (HLSC vs. flat cultivation, FC). Grain yield, energy budgets, carbon footprint, soil carbon sequestration, and economic performance were assessed to quantify system-level sustainability outcomes. Results showed that cooperative farming combined with high-low seedbed cultivation (C-HLSC) consistently outperformed other treatments across multiple sustainability dimensions. Compared with the smallholder with flat cultivation (S-FC), C-HLSC increased grain yield by 12.1% and net income by 67.7%, while achieving the only benefit–cost ratio exceeding unity (1.06). Despite relatively low energy input (29.23 GJ ha -1 ), C-HLSC produced the highest net energy output (269.6 GJ ha -1 ), resulting in superior energy-use efficiency (10.3) and energy productivity (0.31 kg MJ -1 ). Simultaneously, carbon performance improved markedly, with the lowest grain-scaled carbon footprint (0.66 kg CE kg -1 ) and the greatest annual soil organic carbon sequestration (698.0 kg CO 2 -eq ha -1 ). These improvements indicate that enhanced productivity diluted energy and carbon intensity while coordinated farm management improved operational efficiency and economic returns. Overall, the C-HLSC pattern therefore represents a practical pathway for advancing energy-efficient and low-carbon wheat production, providing empirical support for policies promoting cooperative farming and resource-efficient cultivation strategies in the NCP and comparable agroecosystems worldwide. • A long-term field experiment was conducted to assess yield, energy and carbon budgeting under different production type and cultivation pattern. • Cooperative farming increased 3.4% grain yield, 15.1% energy use efficiency, and 39.8% net return, while decreased 5.5% carbon footprint. • High-low seedbed cultivation increased 8.2% grain yield and 19.9% net return, while decreased 9.7% carbon footprint. • Cooperative combined with high-low seedbed cultivation achieved highest energy use efficiency and economic benefit, together with the lowest carbon footprint.

EnergyVol. 353
Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University (NG), Ludong University (CN), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Farmland Irrigation Research Institute (CN), Qinghai Meteorological Bureau (CN), Ningxia Meteorological Bureau (CN), Xinxiang University (CN)
Agriculture Research System of China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.