Barriers to Electrocardiographic Monitoring Practice Among Nurses: A Scoping Review

Despite the evidence of the importance of a good use of the electrocardiographic monitoring (ECG-M) to safe and quality patient care, best practices on ECG-M seem to remain a problem for nurses. The aim of this study was to identify and map the barriers faced by the nursing team in performing ECG-M, as well as the strategies to overcome them. Scoping review according to the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual. The databases used were: Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHAL), Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS), Scopus, and Cochrane. The keywords "Electrocardiography," "Hemodynamic Monitoring," "Nursing," and "Nursing Team" and associated terms were used to find articles published from January 2014 to December 2022, without language restriction. An iterative team approach enabled screening, data selection, and extraction studies that were mapped. Twenty-nine articles were selected and analyzed, and the main barriers were a lack of knowledge and/or skills, as well as difficulty in retaining capacity after an educational intervention. Barriers to adequate cardiac monitoring were related to knowledge and interpretation of ECG-M data, as well as technical aspects related to monitoring. Continuing education strategies, establishment of institutional protocols, and customization of monitoring parameters have been shown to be effective in implementing best practices for ECM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology in Review
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001261
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to Electrocardiographic Monitoring Practice Among Nurses: A Scoping Review

Ângela Carolina Brandão de Souza Giusti, Wellington Pereira da Silva, Flávia Barreto Tavares Chiavone, Marília Estêvam Cornélio et al.
Cardiology in Review
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
article

Barriers to Electrocardiographic Monitoring Practice Among Nurses: A Scoping Review

Ângela Carolina Brandão de Souza Giusti, Wellington Pereira da Silva, Flávia Barreto Tavares Chiavone, Marília Estêvam Cornélio, Maria Cecília Bueno Jayme Gallani, Kleyton Santos de Medeiros
article en

Abstract

Despite the evidence of the importance of a good use of the electrocardiographic monitoring (ECG-M) to safe and quality patient care, best practices on ECG-M seem to remain a problem for nurses. The aim of this study was to identify and map the barriers faced by the nursing team in performing ECG-M, as well as the strategies to overcome them. Scoping review according to the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual. The databases used were: Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHAL), Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS), Scopus, and Cochrane. The keywords "Electrocardiography," "Hemodynamic Monitoring," "Nursing," and "Nursing Team" and associated terms were used to find articles published from January 2014 to December 2022, without language restriction. An iterative team approach enabled screening, data selection, and extraction studies that were mapped. Twenty-nine articles were selected and analyzed, and the main barriers were a lack of knowledge and/or skills, as well as difficulty in retaining capacity after an educational intervention. Barriers to adequate cardiac monitoring were related to knowledge and interpretation of ECG-M data, as well as technical aspects related to monitoring. Continuing education strategies, establishment of institutional protocols, and customization of monitoring parameters have been shown to be effective in implementing best practices for ECM.

Cardiology in Review
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Université Laval (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.