Personalized Digital Care Program Allocation for Older Adults: Reinforcement Learning-Based Simulation Study

BACKGROUND: As the demand for innovative older adult care grows alongside a shortage of care workers, personalization is key to optimizing services and enhancing long-term sustainability. This study proposes an adaptive reinforcement learning (RL)-based framework to promote precision digital care by dynamically assigning care programs based on individuals' unique characteristics and evolving needs. Its effectiveness was evaluated through simulation-based experiments comparing multiple allocation methods within an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered care call service for older adults. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and evaluate an RL-based model for personalizing digital care program allocation to optimize care engagement and health outcomes among low-income older adults living alone. METHODS: We developed the framework by using contextual bandits, specifically Thompson Sampling, to maximize user outcomes. Four program allocation strategies were tested using a synthetic dataset of user features and program attributes. Simulations were conducted over multiple iterations to evaluate how the model adapts over time and optimizes program assignments compared with static methods. RESULTS: Four program allocation methods were compared across 100 simulation runs (n=3000 assignments per run) using 2 datasets (AI Call: n=1196; Community Health Survey [CHS]: n=72,812): (1) systematic allocation (baseline), (2) single best program based on population average, (3) idealized personalized delivery (theoretical upper bound), and (4) precision digital care using Thompson Sampling. Precision digital care outperformed baseline and population-average approaches, achieving outcomes comparable to the theoretical upper bound. Compared to systematic allocation, call success rates increased by 84.2% (AI Call) and 54.4% (CHS), Patient Health Questionnaire-2 depression scores decreased by 32.1% (AI Call) and 41.4% (CHS), and self-reported health scores improved by 19% (AI Call) and 22% (CHS). It also showed improved learning efficiency, refining assignments dynamically as it learned from user responses. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasize the importance of personalization in digital care. We plan to refine and validate the model through a publicly funded AI care program for community-dwelling, low-income older adults living alone in the Republic of Korea. RL offers a scalable and effective approach to advance precision digital care delivery and support future innovations in aging services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Aging
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/86710
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personalized Digital Care Program Allocation for Older Adults: Reinforcement Learning-Based Simulation Study

Jae Yoon Yi, Myunghee Cho Paik, Kyungbok Lee, Hongsoo Kim
JMIR Aging
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Personalized Digital Care Program Allocation for Older Adults: Reinforcement Learning-Based Simulation Study

Jae Yoon Yi, Myunghee Cho Paik, Kyungbok Lee, Hongsoo Kim
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the demand for innovative older adult care grows alongside a shortage of care workers, personalization is key to optimizing services and enhancing long-term sustainability. This study proposes an adaptive reinforcement learning (RL)-based framework to promote precision digital care by dynamically assigning care programs based on individuals' unique characteristics and evolving needs. Its effectiveness was evaluated through simulation-based experiments comparing multiple allocation methods within an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered care call service for older adults. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and evaluate an RL-based model for personalizing digital care program allocation to optimize care engagement and health outcomes among low-income older adults living alone. METHODS: We developed the framework by using contextual bandits, specifically Thompson Sampling, to maximize user outcomes. Four program allocation strategies were tested using a synthetic dataset of user features and program attributes. Simulations were conducted over multiple iterations to evaluate how the model adapts over time and optimizes program assignments compared with static methods. RESULTS: Four program allocation methods were compared across 100 simulation runs (n=3000 assignments per run) using 2 datasets (AI Call: n=1196; Community Health Survey [CHS]: n=72,812): (1) systematic allocation (baseline), (2) single best program based on population average, (3) idealized personalized delivery (theoretical upper bound), and (4) precision digital care using Thompson Sampling. Precision digital care outperformed baseline and population-average approaches, achieving outcomes comparable to the theoretical upper bound. Compared to systematic allocation, call success rates increased by 84.2% (AI Call) and 54.4% (CHS), Patient Health Questionnaire-2 depression scores decreased by 32.1% (AI Call) and 41.4% (CHS), and self-reported health scores improved by 19% (AI Call) and 22% (CHS). It also showed improved learning efficiency, refining assignments dynamically as it learned from user responses. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasize the importance of personalization in digital care. We plan to refine and validate the model through a publicly funded AI care program for community-dwelling, low-income older adults living alone in the Republic of Korea. RL offers a scalable and effective approach to advance precision digital care delivery and support future innovations in aging services.

JMIR AgingVol. 9
Shepherd University (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Seoul National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.