The Effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin and low-level laser therapy on graft shrinkage in free gingival grafts: a randomized controlled clinical trial

The aim of this randomized, controlled clinical study was to evaluate and compare the effects of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) applied over free gingival grafts (FGG) on graft shrinkage, root coverage, and postoperative comfort, in comparison with low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and a control group. A total of 48 patients aged 19–41 years with Cairo et al. Gingival Recession Type 1 (RT1) were randomly allocated into control (n = 16), i-PRF (n = 15), and LLLT (n = 17) groups. The primary outcome was graft shrinkage. Secondary outcomes included gingival recession depth (RD), keratinized tissue height (KTH), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and postoperative outcomes (oedema, erythema, pain, and analgesic consumption). LLLT was applied immediately after surgery and on days 3, 7, and 14 using a 940 nm diode laser (0.21 W, 5 J/cm²). The i-PRF was prepared by centrifuging venous blood at 700 rpm for 3 min and was then applied in gel form onto the graft surface. Graft areas were measured at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months using image analysis software. Postoperative oedema, erythema, pain, and analgesic consumption were also evaluated. Graft shrinkage was significantly higher in control subjects than in both treatment groups, and significantly higher in LLLT than i-PRF at all timepoints. Postoperative edema, erythema, and VAS scores showed no significant intergroup differences. Analgesic use was higher in the control group than in i-PRF. KTH values were greater and RD values lower in the i-PRF group compared with the control and LLLT groups. i-PRF reduced graft shrinkage, enhanced root coverage, and improved postoperative comfort, whereas LLLT contributed minimally to graft stability. i-PRF appears to be an effective biological adjunct in FGG surgery. Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT07303192 Date of registration 20251211).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08309-3
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin and low-level laser therapy on graft shrinkage in free gingival grafts: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Eda Çetın Özdemır, Esra Bozkurt
BMC Oral Health
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

The Effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin and low-level laser therapy on graft shrinkage in free gingival grafts: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Eda Çetın Özdemır, Esra Bozkurt
article en

Abstract

The aim of this randomized, controlled clinical study was to evaluate and compare the effects of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) applied over free gingival grafts (FGG) on graft shrinkage, root coverage, and postoperative comfort, in comparison with low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and a control group. A total of 48 patients aged 19–41 years with Cairo et al. Gingival Recession Type 1 (RT1) were randomly allocated into control (n = 16), i-PRF (n = 15), and LLLT (n = 17) groups. The primary outcome was graft shrinkage. Secondary outcomes included gingival recession depth (RD), keratinized tissue height (KTH), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and postoperative outcomes (oedema, erythema, pain, and analgesic consumption). LLLT was applied immediately after surgery and on days 3, 7, and 14 using a 940 nm diode laser (0.21 W, 5 J/cm²). The i-PRF was prepared by centrifuging venous blood at 700 rpm for 3 min and was then applied in gel form onto the graft surface. Graft areas were measured at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months using image analysis software. Postoperative oedema, erythema, pain, and analgesic consumption were also evaluated. Graft shrinkage was significantly higher in control subjects than in both treatment groups, and significantly higher in LLLT than i-PRF at all timepoints. Postoperative edema, erythema, and VAS scores showed no significant intergroup differences. Analgesic use was higher in the control group than in i-PRF. KTH values were greater and RD values lower in the i-PRF group compared with the control and LLLT groups. i-PRF reduced graft shrinkage, enhanced root coverage, and improved postoperative comfort, whereas LLLT contributed minimally to graft stability. i-PRF appears to be an effective biological adjunct in FGG surgery. Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT07303192 Date of registration 20251211).

BMC Oral Health
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.