Potential Adjunctive Role of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine in the Management of Cancer-Related Bone Pain: A Narrative Review

Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) is known for its therapeutic potential on the musculoskeletal system, and its emerging role and potential benefits in oncology care are gaining attention. Patients with primary and metastatic bone cancer tend to experience pain, restricted movement, and lower quality of life due to the pathology and its treatment. This narrative review examines the mechanistic rationale and available clinical evidence supporting the use of OMM in the management of pain and functional impairment among patients with bone malignancies. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify peer-reviewed studies published between 2005 and 2025 addressing OMM interventions in oncologic and bone cancer populations. Relevant clinical and mechanistic studies were synthesized to evaluate potential therapeutic roles and safety considerations. Limited clinical studies suggest that select OMM techniques, including myofascial release (MFR), gentle soft tissue methods, and lymphatic approaches, may contribute to improvements in pain perception, mobility, and fatigue in oncology populations. Evidence specific to primary bone malignancies remains sparse, with most data derived from small trials, observational studies, and extrapolation from broader cancer cohorts. OMM may offer a non-pharmacologic adjunct targeting biomechanical dysfunction, autonomic regulation, and lymphatic flow, which are implicated in cancer-related pain and functional decline. However, heterogeneity in study design, small sample sizes, and limited bone-specific data constrain definitive conclusions. Current evidence suggests that OMM has potential as a supportive modality in bone cancer care, particularly for symptom management and functional rehabilitation. Rigorous, well-designed clinical trials are needed to establish safety parameters, standardized protocols, and efficacy within this population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.106984
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential Adjunctive Role of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine in the Management of Cancer-Related Bone Pain: A Narrative Review

Hong Trang Nguyen, Ambrose Loc T Ngo, Niki Gharavi Alksari, Monica Rubi et al.
Cureus
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Potential Adjunctive Role of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine in the Management of Cancer-Related Bone Pain: A Narrative Review

Hong Trang Nguyen, Ambrose Loc T Ngo, Niki Gharavi Alksari, Monica Rubi, Chi Pham, David Tanner
article en

Abstract

Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) is known for its therapeutic potential on the musculoskeletal system, and its emerging role and potential benefits in oncology care are gaining attention. Patients with primary and metastatic bone cancer tend to experience pain, restricted movement, and lower quality of life due to the pathology and its treatment. This narrative review examines the mechanistic rationale and available clinical evidence supporting the use of OMM in the management of pain and functional impairment among patients with bone malignancies. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify peer-reviewed studies published between 2005 and 2025 addressing OMM interventions in oncologic and bone cancer populations. Relevant clinical and mechanistic studies were synthesized to evaluate potential therapeutic roles and safety considerations. Limited clinical studies suggest that select OMM techniques, including myofascial release (MFR), gentle soft tissue methods, and lymphatic approaches, may contribute to improvements in pain perception, mobility, and fatigue in oncology populations. Evidence specific to primary bone malignancies remains sparse, with most data derived from small trials, observational studies, and extrapolation from broader cancer cohorts. OMM may offer a non-pharmacologic adjunct targeting biomechanical dysfunction, autonomic regulation, and lymphatic flow, which are implicated in cancer-related pain and functional decline. However, heterogeneity in study design, small sample sizes, and limited bone-specific data constrain definitive conclusions. Current evidence suggests that OMM has potential as a supportive modality in bone cancer care, particularly for symptom management and functional rehabilitation. Rigorous, well-designed clinical trials are needed to establish safety parameters, standardized protocols, and efficacy within this population.

Cureus
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.