Navigating Medication Risk in the <scp>ED</scp> : Communication Preferences of Older Adults Regarding Deprescribing

OBJECTIVES: Patients and experts agree that potentially inappropriate medications should be reconsidered after adverse drug events (ADEs), yet emergency providers are often hesitant to discuss deprescribing in deference to outpatient prescribers. We sought to explore patient communication preferences for deprescribing in the emergency department (ED) after an ADE. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of older adults aged 65 years and older presenting to a southeastern, academic ED from June 2024 to October 2024. While awaiting results, eligible participants completed a best-worst scaling survey comparing seven potential ED communication strategies for prompting deprescription of daily aspirin. The primary analysis tested whether an ED-initiated "therapeutic pause" ("Considering your bleeding, I would like you to hold your aspirin until you can discuss with your primary care provider") was preferred by > 50% of participants over a generic discharge referral to a primary care provider through a one-sided binomial test. Secondary analyses used conditional logistic regression to evaluate relative preference across all seven deprescribing phrases. RESULTS: In total, 102 patients completed the survey with a mean (SD) age of 75 years old (std dev 7). Among all respondents, 62% (95% CI, 52%-71%) preferred an ED-initiated 'therapeutic pause' of aspirin with primary care follow-up to the generic PCP deferral approach (p = 0.01). The least preferred statement was a strict deprescribing recommendation ("I do not think you need aspirin anymore"), which was selected as the least-favored communication approach in 65% of choice tasks. In conditional logistic regression, the therapeutic pause had greater odds of being selected as most preferred compared to the least preferred phrase (OR 9.3; 95% CI, 6.3-13.8). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that ED physicians may take a proactive approach in addressing potential deprescribing in caring for patients with ADEs, such as initiating a therapeutic pause of aspirin after an episode of bleeding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70287
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Medication Risk in the ED : Communication Preferences of Older Adults Regarding Deprescribing

Greta Anton, Ula Hwang, Smeet R. Bhimani, Parag Goyal et al.
Academic Emergency Medicine
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Navigating Medication Risk in the ED : Communication Preferences of Older Adults Regarding Deprescribing

Greta Anton, Ula Hwang, Smeet R. Bhimani, Parag Goyal, Martin F. Casey, Grace A. Burud, M. D. A. A. Meyer, K. Musgrow, Kaitlin Donvan, Andrew Dodson, Joshua Niznik, Emma Lopes
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients and experts agree that potentially inappropriate medications should be reconsidered after adverse drug events (ADEs), yet emergency providers are often hesitant to discuss deprescribing in deference to outpatient prescribers. We sought to explore patient communication preferences for deprescribing in the emergency department (ED) after an ADE. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of older adults aged 65 years and older presenting to a southeastern, academic ED from June 2024 to October 2024. While awaiting results, eligible participants completed a best-worst scaling survey comparing seven potential ED communication strategies for prompting deprescription of daily aspirin. The primary analysis tested whether an ED-initiated "therapeutic pause" ("Considering your bleeding, I would like you to hold your aspirin until you can discuss with your primary care provider") was preferred by > 50% of participants over a generic discharge referral to a primary care provider through a one-sided binomial test. Secondary analyses used conditional logistic regression to evaluate relative preference across all seven deprescribing phrases. RESULTS: In total, 102 patients completed the survey with a mean (SD) age of 75 years old (std dev 7). Among all respondents, 62% (95% CI, 52%-71%) preferred an ED-initiated 'therapeutic pause' of aspirin with primary care follow-up to the generic PCP deferral approach (p = 0.01). The least preferred statement was a strict deprescribing recommendation ("I do not think you need aspirin anymore"), which was selected as the least-favored communication approach in 65% of choice tasks. In conditional logistic regression, the therapeutic pause had greater odds of being selected as most preferred compared to the least preferred phrase (OR 9.3; 95% CI, 6.3-13.8). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that ED physicians may take a proactive approach in addressing potential deprescribing in caring for patients with ADEs, such as initiating a therapeutic pause of aspirin after an episode of bleeding.

Academic Emergency MedicineVol. 33(4)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Cornell University (US), James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), New York University (US)
National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.