Sociocratic management practices at schools: school administrators and teachers' views

Introduction Sociocratic management has recently gained attention as a participatory and consent-based governance model that may enhance democratic leadership practices in schools. This study aims to explore school administrators' and teachers' perceptions of sociocratic circular management practices within educational institutions. Methods This qualitative phenomenological study involved 16 school administrators and teachers selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using descriptive thematic analysis. Results The findings reveal a clear divergence between participant groups: while teachers mainly perceived existing school management as autocratic, administrators tended to describe it as democratic. Both groups emphasized that the centralized structure of the educational system restricts participation in decision-making processes and limits the implementation of sociocratic principles. Additionally, participants' limited conceptual understanding of sociocratic circular management emerged as a barrier to practice. Discussion The study concludes that the effective implementation of sociocratic management in schools requires structural support for shared decision-making as well as leadership roles grounded in facilitation and representation. These findings contribute to the literature by demonstrating how centralized governance contexts shape the applicability of participatory management models and by offering implications for educational leadership practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1773173
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociocratic management practices at schools: school administrators and teachers' views

Püren Akçay, Arslan Bayram, Aydin Balyer
Frontiers in Education
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Sociocratic management practices at schools: school administrators and teachers' views

Püren Akçay, Arslan Bayram, Aydin Balyer
article en

Abstract

Introduction Sociocratic management has recently gained attention as a participatory and consent-based governance model that may enhance democratic leadership practices in schools. This study aims to explore school administrators' and teachers' perceptions of sociocratic circular management practices within educational institutions. Methods This qualitative phenomenological study involved 16 school administrators and teachers selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using descriptive thematic analysis. Results The findings reveal a clear divergence between participant groups: while teachers mainly perceived existing school management as autocratic, administrators tended to describe it as democratic. Both groups emphasized that the centralized structure of the educational system restricts participation in decision-making processes and limits the implementation of sociocratic principles. Additionally, participants' limited conceptual understanding of sociocratic circular management emerged as a barrier to practice. Discussion The study concludes that the effective implementation of sociocratic management in schools requires structural support for shared decision-making as well as leadership roles grounded in facilitation and representation. These findings contribute to the literature by demonstrating how centralized governance contexts shape the applicability of participatory management models and by offering implications for educational leadership practices.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
Artvin Coruh University (TR), Haliç University (TR), Yıldız Technical University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.