Role of non-invasive brain stimulation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in improving fine motor performance of post-stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is one of the considered interventions to improve fine motor skills in stroke patients. However, there could be various frequencies and durations performed in each trial involving Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation that might affect the patient’s outcome. This research was to investigate the potential enhancement of fine motor performance in stroke patients through the application of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques. The literature search was carried out through 3 electronic databases, namely PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect which include articles published up to 31 December 2024, and published in English. Before selecting the studies, the study duplication was detected by Zotero Reference Manager® and then removed. The related studies examined and selected with rayyan.ai® website using a “blind-on” mode to ensure eligibility. Twenty-two studies comparing Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation vs. controls with the frequencies of outcomes used were Fugl-Meyer Assessment (68.4%), and Action Research Arm Test (15.7%) were reviewed with thirteen of them included in meta-analysis. All articles were randomized controlled trials. The effect size in repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) stroke comparisons was 2.58 (95% CI, 0.18–4.97; P = 0.04; Tau2, 19.05; I2, 99%; Q, 1367.54; P < 0.00001), whereas the Electrical Stimulation for theta burst stimulation (TBS) comparisons was 1.25 (95% CI, 0.01–2.49; P = 0.05; Tau2, 0.57; I2, 54%; Q, 4.34; P = 0.11). Conclusion: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) with rTMS is one of the considered interventions to improve fine motor skills in stroke patients. Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation has a better significance than the conventional therapy methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Neurology
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-026-04839-z
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of non-invasive brain stimulation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in improving fine motor performance of post-stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lisda Amalia
BMC Neurology
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Role of non-invasive brain stimulation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in improving fine motor performance of post-stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lisda Amalia
article en

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is one of the considered interventions to improve fine motor skills in stroke patients. However, there could be various frequencies and durations performed in each trial involving Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation that might affect the patient’s outcome. This research was to investigate the potential enhancement of fine motor performance in stroke patients through the application of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques. The literature search was carried out through 3 electronic databases, namely PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect which include articles published up to 31 December 2024, and published in English. Before selecting the studies, the study duplication was detected by Zotero Reference Manager® and then removed. The related studies examined and selected with rayyan.ai® website using a “blind-on” mode to ensure eligibility. Twenty-two studies comparing Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation vs. controls with the frequencies of outcomes used were Fugl-Meyer Assessment (68.4%), and Action Research Arm Test (15.7%) were reviewed with thirteen of them included in meta-analysis. All articles were randomized controlled trials. The effect size in repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) stroke comparisons was 2.58 (95% CI, 0.18–4.97; P = 0.04; Tau2, 19.05; I2, 99%; Q, 1367.54; P < 0.00001), whereas the Electrical Stimulation for theta burst stimulation (TBS) comparisons was 1.25 (95% CI, 0.01–2.49; P = 0.05; Tau2, 0.57; I2, 54%; Q, 4.34; P = 0.11). Conclusion: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) with rTMS is one of the considered interventions to improve fine motor skills in stroke patients. Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation has a better significance than the conventional therapy methods.

BMC Neurology
Padjadjaran University (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Role of non-invasive brain stimulation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in improving fine motor performance of post-stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis — Lisda Amalia · BMC Neurology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS