Toward a Framework of Inclusive, Socially-Just, Disability-Centered District Special Education Leadership: Scope, Strategy, and Action

Purpose : The focus of this study was to understand how district-level, central office administrators lead inclusive districts. Research Methods: This study is grounded in a conceptual framework informed by the traditions and knowledge of leadership for inclusion of students with disabilities, social justice, and disability studies in education. This research project spanned three years, involving frequent research meetings, interviews, sharing of district documents, member check meetings, email debriefing of interviews and transcripts, detailed field logs, and data collection memos. This included in-depth interviewing as a data collection method, that was used for the purpose of understanding the ways in which special education administrators make sense of their leadership role. Findings : We found two main avenues for these district administrators’ enactment of inclusive leadership: 1) engaging in student-level advocacy and 2) engaging in systems-level advocacy. These leaders operated at both the student-level, addressing student-specific issues, and maintained a broader lens and focus on systems (school, district, and community). Findings reveal the leadership scope, strategy, and actions leaders took, leading to a proposed framework of inclusive, socially-just, disability-centered district leadership. Implications : Recommendations are made for district leadership, leadership preparation, and future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Administration Quarterly
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x261436017
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a Framework of Inclusive, Socially-Just, Disability-Centered District Special Education Leadership: Scope, Strategy, and Action

Chelsea P. Tracy-Bronson, George Theoharis
Educational Administration Quarterly
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Toward a Framework of Inclusive, Socially-Just, Disability-Centered District Special Education Leadership: Scope, Strategy, and Action

Chelsea P. Tracy-Bronson, George Theoharis
article en

Abstract

Purpose : The focus of this study was to understand how district-level, central office administrators lead inclusive districts. Research Methods: This study is grounded in a conceptual framework informed by the traditions and knowledge of leadership for inclusion of students with disabilities, social justice, and disability studies in education. This research project spanned three years, involving frequent research meetings, interviews, sharing of district documents, member check meetings, email debriefing of interviews and transcripts, detailed field logs, and data collection memos. This included in-depth interviewing as a data collection method, that was used for the purpose of understanding the ways in which special education administrators make sense of their leadership role. Findings : We found two main avenues for these district administrators’ enactment of inclusive leadership: 1) engaging in student-level advocacy and 2) engaging in systems-level advocacy. These leaders operated at both the student-level, addressing student-specific issues, and maintained a broader lens and focus on systems (school, district, and community). Findings reveal the leadership scope, strategy, and actions leaders took, leading to a proposed framework of inclusive, socially-just, disability-centered district leadership. Implications : Recommendations are made for district leadership, leadership preparation, and future research.

Educational Administration Quarterly
Stockton University (US), Syracuse University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.