Neural and Behavioral Tracking of Musical Phrases Occurs Without Temporal Regularity
When listening to music or speech, people naturally divide continuous sound streams into segments for easier and faster processing of information. The segmentation boundaries are not random. Listeners agree on the points of segmentation, which are consistent with arbitrary rules-for example, those established by music theory-and often occur at regular time intervals. It is thus unclear whether phrase tracking relies on understanding of musical structure or merely on temporal predictability. To address this, we examined how non-musicians process both regular (temporally predictable) and irregular musical phrases derived from J.S. Bach's compositions. This approach preserved authentic musical structure while manipulating temporal predictability. We also included control stimuli matched in acoustic properties but lacking musical structure. Behavioral and EEG measures revealed that listeners could accurately detect phrase boundaries in both regular and irregular conditions. Neural activity, indexed by an increase in low-frequency EEG power, reflected the tracking structural boundaries regardless of temporal regularity. These findings demonstrate that musical segmentation depends fundamentally on implicit understanding of musical structure, rather than on temporal predictability alone.
Authors
- Xiangbin Teng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5360-4957)
- Pauline Larrouy-Maestri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9245-0743)
- Zofia Anna Hołubowska (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1113-4509)
Institutions
- Jagiellonian University (PL)
- Leipzig University of Applied Sciences (DE)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics (DE)
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
- Leipzig University (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Published
- 2026-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.70481
- Primary Topic
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00