A Pre–Post Study of the Feasibility, Acceptability and Benefits of a Co‐Design Approach for the Development of a Digital Suicide Prevention App for International Students

BACKGROUND: Interest in co-design for suicide prevention is growing, yet few studies have evaluated feasibility, acceptability and impact, particularly for culturally and linguistically diverse populations. This study assessed a co-design process used to develop a digital suicide prevention intervention with international students in Australia. DESIGN: We conducted a mixed-methods pre-post evaluation across 10 student and three stakeholder workshops. Participants were 27 international students (57.7% with lived experience of suicidal thoughts and behaviours) from 18 countries and 21 sector stakeholders (education, well-being and student services). Surveys assessed feasibility, acceptability, safety, satisfaction, perceived benefits and confidence in co-design skills. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and paired t-tests; open-ended responses were thematically summarised. RESULTS: Workshops were feasible, with high ratings for accessibility, support and safety. International students reported high acceptability and satisfaction, with significant increases in co-design confidence (e.g., collaborating, adapting, participating and influencing outcomes) and perceived benefits (greater mental-health literacy, empowerment, social connection and belonging). Stakeholders reported moderate to high acceptability and valued cross-sector learning and system insights; confidence ratings showed no measurable change. Safety ratings were high for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Co-design was feasible, acceptable and safe, and associated with benefits for participants. Findings support co-design as a practical, capacity-building approach for developing culturally responsive digital suicide-prevention initiatives for culturally and linguistically diverse populations. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: An expert advisory group of international students with lived experience of suicide provided ongoing guidance. International students and sector stakeholders co-designed the intervention and contributed to planning, design, implementation and review.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70669
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Pre–Post Study of the Feasibility, Acceptability and Benefits of a Co‐Design Approach for the Development of a Digital Suicide Prevention App for International Students

Christina Ng, Vivienne Browne, Samuel McKay, Shane Robinson et al.
Health Expectations
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

A Pre–Post Study of the Feasibility, Acceptability and Benefits of a Co‐Design Approach for the Development of a Digital Suicide Prevention App for International Students

Christina Ng, Vivienne Browne, Samuel McKay, Shane Robinson, Madhavan Mani, Ellie Brown, Isabella Choi, Michelle Lamblin, Gregory Armstrong, Gina Chinnery, Bailey Nation-Ingle, Ella Perlow, Tanvi Shaikh, Jennifer Nicholas, Kristal Allison
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interest in co-design for suicide prevention is growing, yet few studies have evaluated feasibility, acceptability and impact, particularly for culturally and linguistically diverse populations. This study assessed a co-design process used to develop a digital suicide prevention intervention with international students in Australia. DESIGN: We conducted a mixed-methods pre-post evaluation across 10 student and three stakeholder workshops. Participants were 27 international students (57.7% with lived experience of suicidal thoughts and behaviours) from 18 countries and 21 sector stakeholders (education, well-being and student services). Surveys assessed feasibility, acceptability, safety, satisfaction, perceived benefits and confidence in co-design skills. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and paired t-tests; open-ended responses were thematically summarised. RESULTS: Workshops were feasible, with high ratings for accessibility, support and safety. International students reported high acceptability and satisfaction, with significant increases in co-design confidence (e.g., collaborating, adapting, participating and influencing outcomes) and perceived benefits (greater mental-health literacy, empowerment, social connection and belonging). Stakeholders reported moderate to high acceptability and valued cross-sector learning and system insights; confidence ratings showed no measurable change. Safety ratings were high for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Co-design was feasible, acceptable and safe, and associated with benefits for participants. Findings support co-design as a practical, capacity-building approach for developing culturally responsive digital suicide-prevention initiatives for culturally and linguistically diverse populations. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: An expert advisory group of international students with lived experience of suicide provided ongoing guidance. International students and sector stakeholders co-designed the intervention and contributed to planning, design, implementation and review.

Health ExpectationsVol. 29(2)
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Government of Victoria (AU), Queensland Government (AU), Orygen (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course (AU), Melbourne Health (AU)
University of Melbourne
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.