A Pre–Post Study of the Feasibility, Acceptability and Benefits of a Co‐Design Approach for the Development of a Digital Suicide Prevention App for International Students
BACKGROUND: Interest in co-design for suicide prevention is growing, yet few studies have evaluated feasibility, acceptability and impact, particularly for culturally and linguistically diverse populations. This study assessed a co-design process used to develop a digital suicide prevention intervention with international students in Australia. DESIGN: We conducted a mixed-methods pre-post evaluation across 10 student and three stakeholder workshops. Participants were 27 international students (57.7% with lived experience of suicidal thoughts and behaviours) from 18 countries and 21 sector stakeholders (education, well-being and student services). Surveys assessed feasibility, acceptability, safety, satisfaction, perceived benefits and confidence in co-design skills. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and paired t-tests; open-ended responses were thematically summarised. RESULTS: Workshops were feasible, with high ratings for accessibility, support and safety. International students reported high acceptability and satisfaction, with significant increases in co-design confidence (e.g., collaborating, adapting, participating and influencing outcomes) and perceived benefits (greater mental-health literacy, empowerment, social connection and belonging). Stakeholders reported moderate to high acceptability and valued cross-sector learning and system insights; confidence ratings showed no measurable change. Safety ratings were high for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Co-design was feasible, acceptable and safe, and associated with benefits for participants. Findings support co-design as a practical, capacity-building approach for developing culturally responsive digital suicide-prevention initiatives for culturally and linguistically diverse populations. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: An expert advisory group of international students with lived experience of suicide provided ongoing guidance. International students and sector stakeholders co-designed the intervention and contributed to planning, design, implementation and review.
Authors
- Christina Ng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2101-5514)
- Vivienne Browne (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9678-9256)
- Samuel McKay (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-5285)
- Shane Robinson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9506-5752)
- Madhavan Mani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3384-8070)
- Ellie Brown
- Isabella Choi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6033-1563)
- Michelle Lamblin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4085-8637)
- Gregory Armstrong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8073-9213)
- Gina Chinnery
- Bailey Nation-Ingle
- Ella Perlow
- Tanvi Shaikh
- Jennifer Nicholas
- Kristal Allison
Institutions
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Government of Victoria (AU)
- Queensland Government (AU)
- Orygen (AU)
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course (AU)
- Melbourne Health (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Health Expectations
- Published
- 2026-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70669
- Primary Topic
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- University of Melbourne