AI Methods for Implementation Science (AIM-IS): developing a framework, toolkit, and reporting standard for the responsible use of AI in implementation practice and research

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning, natural language processing, and large language models, may support implementation practice and research in tasks such as evidence synthesis, determinant assessment, strategy selection, monitoring, adaptation, and theory development. However, these applications of AI do not form a single, uniform category. They span a continuum from practice-facing applications that support local implementation work to research- and methods-facing applications that support evidence generation and synthesis. The guidance on how to classify, evaluate, and report these uses of AI remains limited. The AI Methods for Implementation Science (AIM-IS) program aims to develop, validate, and maintain a suite of products to guide the responsible use of AI across implementation practice, implementation research, and bridging use cases. METHODS: AIM-IS is a multi-phase, multi-method methodological development program. The unit of analysis is the AI-for-implementation use case: a specific AI capability supporting a defined implementation practice or research task within a workflow, decision point, and governance context. Phase 1 is a living scoping review mapping published AI use cases in implementation science, including how they are evaluated and what risks they raise. Phase 2 is a qualitative interview study with implementation researchers, practitioners, AI experts, community members, and data infrastructure and governance experts to refine use cases and identify feasibility constraints, outcome priorities, and reporting needs. Phase 3 will integrate findings from Phases 1 and 2 to develop the draft AIM-IS products, including a framework, a taxonomy of use cases, guardrails for responsible use, a practical guide, outcome domains, and reporting items. Phase 4 will use an eDelphi process and consensus meeting to refine and finalize these products. Phase 5 will conduct usability testing to improve clarity and ease of use, resulting in the finalized AIM-IS products. AIM-IS is informed by implementation science, sociotechnical systems, equity, and responsible AI frameworks, and includes a living-update approach to support ongoing refinement. DISCUSSION: The AIM-IS program will deliver a suite of products, including a framework, toolkit and reporting standard, to support the specification, governance, evaluation, and reporting of AI in implementation science. Together, these products aim to strengthen transparency, comparability, accountability, and attention to equity in how AI is used by implementation practitioners and researchers over time. REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework, March 15, 2026: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BX35K.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-026-01503-5
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Methods for Implementation Science (AIM-IS): developing a framework, toolkit, and reporting standard for the responsible use of AI in implementation practice and research

Ashrita Saran, J. Chan, Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi, Ruopeng An et al.
Implementation Science
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

AI Methods for Implementation Science (AIM-IS): developing a framework, toolkit, and reporting standard for the responsible use of AI in implementation practice and research

Ashrita Saran, J. Chan, Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi, Ruopeng An, Byron J. Powell, James Thomas, Rinad S. Beidas, Elvin Geng, Sharon E. Straus, Natalie Taylor, France Légaré, Susan Michie, Janna Hastings, Sylvie D. Lambert, Guillaume Fontaine, Vivian Welch, Christine Fahim, Justin Presseau
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning, natural language processing, and large language models, may support implementation practice and research in tasks such as evidence synthesis, determinant assessment, strategy selection, monitoring, adaptation, and theory development. However, these applications of AI do not form a single, uniform category. They span a continuum from practice-facing applications that support local implementation work to research- and methods-facing applications that support evidence generation and synthesis. The guidance on how to classify, evaluate, and report these uses of AI remains limited. The AI Methods for Implementation Science (AIM-IS) program aims to develop, validate, and maintain a suite of products to guide the responsible use of AI across implementation practice, implementation research, and bridging use cases. METHODS: AIM-IS is a multi-phase, multi-method methodological development program. The unit of analysis is the AI-for-implementation use case: a specific AI capability supporting a defined implementation practice or research task within a workflow, decision point, and governance context. Phase 1 is a living scoping review mapping published AI use cases in implementation science, including how they are evaluated and what risks they raise. Phase 2 is a qualitative interview study with implementation researchers, practitioners, AI experts, community members, and data infrastructure and governance experts to refine use cases and identify feasibility constraints, outcome priorities, and reporting needs. Phase 3 will integrate findings from Phases 1 and 2 to develop the draft AIM-IS products, including a framework, a taxonomy of use cases, guardrails for responsible use, a practical guide, outcome domains, and reporting items. Phase 4 will use an eDelphi process and consensus meeting to refine and finalize these products. Phase 5 will conduct usability testing to improve clarity and ease of use, resulting in the finalized AIM-IS products. AIM-IS is informed by implementation science, sociotechnical systems, equity, and responsible AI frameworks, and includes a living-update approach to support ongoing refinement. DISCUSSION: The AIM-IS program will deliver a suite of products, including a framework, toolkit and reporting standard, to support the specification, governance, evaluation, and reporting of AI in implementation science. Together, these products aim to strengthen transparency, comparability, accountability, and attention to equity in how AI is used by implementation practitioners and researchers over time. REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework, March 15, 2026: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BX35K.

Implementation Science
Northwestern University (US), SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH), Global Development Network (IN), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Ottawa Hospital (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), St Mary's Hospital Centre (CA), UNSW Sydney (AU), Centre for Sustainable Energy (GB), Bruyère (CA), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (CA), Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA), Sydney Orthopaedic Research Institute (AU), Université Laval (CA), Unity Health Toronto, University College London (GB), McGill University (CA), New York University (US), Idiap Research Institute (CH)
Fonds de recherche du Québec, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.