Enhancing Arabic Multi-Task Sentiment Analysis Through Distillation and Adversarial Training
The rapid growth of Arabic social media content requires the development of accurate and efficient methods for sentiment analysis. We propose a resource-efficient multi-task learning (MTL) framework for modern standard Arabic (MSA). The model uses a shared AraBERT encoder to jointly predict emotion, polarity, and intention. We integrate knowledge distillation (KD) from a large teacher model, self-distillation (SD) using model self-ensembling, and adversarial training (AT) as a regularization strategy. Experiments conducted on an annotated corpus of MSA tweets demonstrate that all distilled models outperform a fine-tuned multi-task baseline, and the combined KD+SD+AT configuration achieves competitive results. For instance, KD alone raised Macro F1 for emotion from 0.83 to 0.88 and for intention from 0.67 to 0.72. KD+SD+AT achieved the best intention F1 (0.76) and the highest polarity F1 (0.90). Notably, F1-scores for several minority classes show consistent improvement, particularly under KD and combined configurations. Paired t-tests confirm that several improvements, especially those obtained with KD and KD+SD+AT, are statistically significant (p<0.05). Our results indicate that distillation, combined with adversarial regularization, enables the development of smaller and more efficient Arabic sentiment models while maintaining competitive accuracy. These findings address a gap in Arabic multi-task sentiment analysis and provide a scalable, resource-efficient framework, along with empirical insights for distillation in Arabic language models.
Authors
- Safâa El Ouahabi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9752-7858)
- Mouncef Filali Bouami (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5244-2589)
- Hafida Hidani
Institutions
- Premier University (BD)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction
- Published
- 2026-04-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/make8040100
- Primary Topic
- Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00