Determining the Most Predictive Discipline in Olympic Triathlon: A Machine Learning Approach

Background: The aim of the present study was to identify the discipline with the greatest predictive value for overall performance in Olympic-distance triathlon. Methods: Data were extracted from the API (Application Programming Interface) service on the World Triathlon website by signing up for the free service. A custom Python code was written to perform different data collection operations. General statistical analyses and machine learning analyses were performed by creating a Jupyter Notebook file. TensorFlow and PyTorch libraries were used for machine learning analysis. Results: Fifty percent of the employed models identified cycling as the most predictive discipline for race success for both sexes, whereas 33% selected running as the determining discipline. To achieve a podium finish, approximately 78% of the models classified running as the most predictive discipline for males, and approximately 56% of the models did so for females. For finishes between fourth and tenth place, approximately 78% of the models proposed running as the most predictive discipline for both sexes. Swimming was never identified as the most predictive discipline by the majority of models for any group or sex. Conclusion: The most predictive discipline in Olympic triathlon depends on the athlete’s sex and competitive level. Nonetheless, running remains the most consistently predictive discipline, whereas swimming rarely acts as a performance differentiator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematical and Computational Applications
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/mca31020060
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining the Most Predictive Discipline in Olympic Triathlon: A Machine Learning Approach

José Antonio González-Jurado, Luca Bianchini, Maria Francesca Piacentini, Andrea Fuk et al.
Mathematical and Computational Applications
Sports Performance and Training
article

Determining the Most Predictive Discipline in Olympic Triathlon: A Machine Learning Approach

José Antonio González-Jurado, Luca Bianchini, Maria Francesca Piacentini, Andrea Fuk, Simone Villanova, Pablo García-González
article en

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to identify the discipline with the greatest predictive value for overall performance in Olympic-distance triathlon. Methods: Data were extracted from the API (Application Programming Interface) service on the World Triathlon website by signing up for the free service. A custom Python code was written to perform different data collection operations. General statistical analyses and machine learning analyses were performed by creating a Jupyter Notebook file. TensorFlow and PyTorch libraries were used for machine learning analysis. Results: Fifty percent of the employed models identified cycling as the most predictive discipline for race success for both sexes, whereas 33% selected running as the determining discipline. To achieve a podium finish, approximately 78% of the models classified running as the most predictive discipline for males, and approximately 56% of the models did so for females. For finishes between fourth and tenth place, approximately 78% of the models proposed running as the most predictive discipline for both sexes. Swimming was never identified as the most predictive discipline by the majority of models for any group or sex. Conclusion: The most predictive discipline in Olympic triathlon depends on the athlete’s sex and competitive level. Nonetheless, running remains the most consistently predictive discipline, whereas swimming rarely acts as a performance differentiator.

Mathematical and Computational ApplicationsVol. 31(2)
Foro Italico University of Rome (IT), Centro Diagnostico Italiano (IT), Universidad Pablo de Olavide (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.