Clitic placement and the Anti-V2 effect in European Portuguese

Abstract Clitic placement with European Portuguese uninflected verbs is problematic for prosodic analyses. While ‘proclisis triggers’ give rise to obligatory proclisis with inflected verbs, they often lead to optional proclisis/enclisis with uninflected verbs ( Raposo & Uriagereka 2008 ), except for aspectual/quantificational adverbials with head-like behaviour ( Martins 2013a ). These patterns provide support for a syntactic ‘Anti-V2 requirement’, whereby clitics usually raise to adjoin to T and either: (a) an XP raises to/through spec FinP and the verb stays in Asp (resulting in proclisis); or (b) the verb raises through T to Fin (resulting in enclisis); but not both (building on Fernández-Rubiera 2009 , 2010 ). The special behaviour of uninflected infinitives can be explained by the possibility of clitics attaching to a lower verbal host and then moving with that host to T resulting in enclisis ( Raposo and Uriagereka 2008 ). Aspectual/quantificational heads block verb movement to T, ruling out enclisis via ‘low fusion’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistic Variation
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.24058.she
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clitic placement and the Anti-V2 effect in European Portuguese

Michelle Sheehan
Linguistic Variation
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Clitic placement and the Anti-V2 effect in European Portuguese

Michelle Sheehan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Clitic placement with European Portuguese uninflected verbs is problematic for prosodic analyses. While ‘proclisis triggers’ give rise to obligatory proclisis with inflected verbs, they often lead to optional proclisis/enclisis with uninflected verbs ( Raposo & Uriagereka 2008 ), except for aspectual/quantificational adverbials with head-like behaviour ( Martins 2013a ). These patterns provide support for a syntactic ‘Anti-V2 requirement’, whereby clitics usually raise to adjoin to T and either: (a) an XP raises to/through spec FinP and the verb stays in Asp (resulting in proclisis); or (b) the verb raises through T to Fin (resulting in enclisis); but not both (building on Fernández-Rubiera 2009 , 2010 ). The special behaviour of uninflected infinitives can be explained by the possibility of clitics attaching to a lower verbal host and then moving with that host to T resulting in enclisis ( Raposo and Uriagereka 2008 ). Aspectual/quantificational heads block verb movement to T, ruling out enclisis via ‘low fusion’.

Linguistic Variation
Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.