Combining different views on internal climate variability of temperature over Europe

Internal climate variability (ICV) represents the intrinsic fluctuations within the climate system. Understanding how ICV varies across regions, seasons, and climatic conditions is crucial for detecting externally forced climate change and assessing future climate risks. It can also provide a useful benchmark for assessing climate model performance and the emergence of anthropogenically forced climate change. This study aims to compare ICV estimates obtained using different methods and data types. We focus on seasonal mean near-surface air temperature over Europe, utilizing data from 15 CMIP6 models, a 100-member MPI-ESM large ensemble, and three observational datasets. The ICV estimates are based on pre-industrial control simulations (Pidata), the Hawkins and Sutton (2009) residual-based method (HS09), regression-based removal of external forcings, and a single-model large-ensemble framework. The magnitude of ICV estimates generally decreases from northeastern to southwestern Europe on both annual and seasonal timescales, except during JJA, when the highest estimates shift southward. The highest ICV estimates are observed in DJF and the lowest at the annual timescale. Among all the methods, Pidata generally yields the highest ICV estimates across all seasonal and annual timescales, except during JJA. Based on the HS09 method, the similarity between the model-based estimates and the observations is most pronounced during DJF and at the annual timescale. However, this similarity is weaker when the regression-based method is applied, with the model-based estimates generally exceeding the observation-based ones. The projected changes in ICV show a tendency for reduced (enhanced) values in DJF (JJA). Although a north-south contrast emerges in other seasons, with declining (increasing) ICV in northern (southern) Europe, the overall spatial pattern indicates a reduction in projected ICV estimates across large parts of Europe, except during JJA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth System Dynamics
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1649-2026
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Combining different views on internal climate variability of temperature over Europe

Herijaona Hani‐Roge Hundilida Randriatsara, Eva Holtanová, Jiří Mikšovský
Earth System Dynamics
Climate variability and models
article

Combining different views on internal climate variability of temperature over Europe

Herijaona Hani‐Roge Hundilida Randriatsara, Eva Holtanová, Jiří Mikšovský
article en

Abstract

Internal climate variability (ICV) represents the intrinsic fluctuations within the climate system. Understanding how ICV varies across regions, seasons, and climatic conditions is crucial for detecting externally forced climate change and assessing future climate risks. It can also provide a useful benchmark for assessing climate model performance and the emergence of anthropogenically forced climate change. This study aims to compare ICV estimates obtained using different methods and data types. We focus on seasonal mean near-surface air temperature over Europe, utilizing data from 15 CMIP6 models, a 100-member MPI-ESM large ensemble, and three observational datasets. The ICV estimates are based on pre-industrial control simulations (Pidata), the Hawkins and Sutton (2009) residual-based method (HS09), regression-based removal of external forcings, and a single-model large-ensemble framework. The magnitude of ICV estimates generally decreases from northeastern to southwestern Europe on both annual and seasonal timescales, except during JJA, when the highest estimates shift southward. The highest ICV estimates are observed in DJF and the lowest at the annual timescale. Among all the methods, Pidata generally yields the highest ICV estimates across all seasonal and annual timescales, except during JJA. Based on the HS09 method, the similarity between the model-based estimates and the observations is most pronounced during DJF and at the annual timescale. However, this similarity is weaker when the regression-based method is applied, with the model-based estimates generally exceeding the observation-based ones. The projected changes in ICV show a tendency for reduced (enhanced) values in DJF (JJA). Although a north-south contrast emerges in other seasons, with declining (increasing) ICV in northern (southern) Europe, the overall spatial pattern indicates a reduction in projected ICV estimates across large parts of Europe, except during JJA.

Earth System DynamicsVol. 17(6)
Charles University (CZ)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy, Grantová Agentura České Republiky, Goddard Space Flight Center
Climate action
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon