The Politics of Limburgish: Provincial Debate and Bottom-Up Practices of Belonging

This paper investigates if the institutional promotion of Limburgish contributes to the construction of regional identity in the Dutch province of Limburg, and if/how it influences processes of social inclusion and exclusion. It combines theoretical concepts of regional identity, performativity, othering, and belonging with a discourse analysis of a Provincial Council debate, and some survey findings. The findings show that Limburgish is symbolically framed as a marker of pride, authenticity, and cultural intimacy. While many L1 or 2L1 speakers experience it as reinforcing regional belonging, those lacking proficiency report structural exclusion, particularly in informal spaces. The paper concludes that language policy in Limburg does more than support heritage; it actively shapes who is included as a Limburger and who is not. We recommend inclusive strategies that acknowledge both the symbolic value and social effects of dialect use in regional identity-making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Taal en tongval
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5117/tet2026.1.001.haem
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of Limburgish: Provincial Debate and Bottom-Up Practices of Belonging

Roel Haemers, Leonie Cornips
Taal en tongval
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

The Politics of Limburgish: Provincial Debate and Bottom-Up Practices of Belonging

Roel Haemers, Leonie Cornips
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates if the institutional promotion of Limburgish contributes to the construction of regional identity in the Dutch province of Limburg, and if/how it influences processes of social inclusion and exclusion. It combines theoretical concepts of regional identity, performativity, othering, and belonging with a discourse analysis of a Provincial Council debate, and some survey findings. The findings show that Limburgish is symbolically framed as a marker of pride, authenticity, and cultural intimacy. While many L1 or 2L1 speakers experience it as reinforcing regional belonging, those lacking proficiency report structural exclusion, particularly in informal spaces. The paper concludes that language policy in Limburg does more than support heritage; it actively shapes who is included as a Limburger and who is not. We recommend inclusive strategies that acknowledge both the symbolic value and social effects of dialect use in regional identity-making.

Taal en tongvalVol. 78(1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.