From asylum to administration: Bureaucratic legitimacy and the strategic silencing of refugees and migrants in Greek immigration discourse

This study examines the discourse of Makis Voridis during his 2025 tenure as Greek Minister of Migration and Asylum, focusing on how bureaucratic legitimacy is constructed through the strategic silencing of refugee and migrant voices. Using corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis, the research combines frequency analysis with Systemic Functional Grammar to show how Greek immigration discourse frames migration as a security threat and asylum as an administrative burden rather than a right. The analysis identifies three key discursive strategies: (1) the securitisation of migration, (2) the bureaucratisation and depoliticisation of asylum procedures, and (3) the strategic silencing of refugees and migrants and the erasure of their agency and rights. These findings contribute to understanding how exclusionary migration policies are legitimised through technocratic discourse while preserving the appearance of democratic governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical approaches to discourse analysis across disciplines
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21827/cadaad.18.1.42985
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From asylum to administration: Bureaucratic legitimacy and the strategic silencing of refugees and migrants in Greek immigration discourse

Efi Garidi
Critical approaches to discourse analysis across disciplines
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

From asylum to administration: Bureaucratic legitimacy and the strategic silencing of refugees and migrants in Greek immigration discourse

Efi Garidi
article en

Abstract

This study examines the discourse of Makis Voridis during his 2025 tenure as Greek Minister of Migration and Asylum, focusing on how bureaucratic legitimacy is constructed through the strategic silencing of refugee and migrant voices. Using corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis, the research combines frequency analysis with Systemic Functional Grammar to show how Greek immigration discourse frames migration as a security threat and asylum as an administrative burden rather than a right. The analysis identifies three key discursive strategies: (1) the securitisation of migration, (2) the bureaucratisation and depoliticisation of asylum procedures, and (3) the strategic silencing of refugees and migrants and the erasure of their agency and rights. These findings contribute to understanding how exclusionary migration policies are legitimised through technocratic discourse while preserving the appearance of democratic governance.

Critical approaches to discourse analysis across disciplinesVol. 18(1)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.