Analysis of Car-Following Safety Evolution in Mixed-Driving Environment: A Resilience Perspective

As autonomous-driving technology advances, autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) are expected to coexist for an extended period. While resilience is widely applied in macro safety analysis, its application in micro-process modeling remains underdeveloped. This study proposes a resilience-based framework comprising three phases (initial, safety decay, safety recovery) to investigate the evolution of driving risk across three car-following scenarios: HV–HV (HV following HV), HV–AV (HV following AV), and AV–HV (AV following HV). The analytical framework consists of three steps: First, car-following pairs with complete risk-evolution processes were identified. Second, cluster analysis was applied to categorize phase-specific patterns. Third, the association rule mining algorithm was used to trace risk-evolution chains, followed by a comprehensive evaluation integrating safety and efficiency. Key findings include: (1) significant and rapid safety decay being accompanied by swift recovery, and the following vehicle exhibiting significant feature differences across recovery patterns; (2) safety decay in HV–AV being slower than that in HV–HV, with HV–AV demonstrating a close and conservative driving strategy during the risk-evolution process, with HV–AV meanwhile performing worse in safety and efficiency compared with HV–HV, highlighting the interaction discordance between HV and AV; (3) excessive deceleration of HV being the primary trigger for safety degradation in AV–HV, and AV demonstrating effective adaptation to safety decay, promoting slight safety reduction with rapid recovery, thereby balancing safety and efficiency. These findings reveal principles of risk evolution in mixed-driving environments, providing a novel analytical framework for mixed-driving safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981261432591
Primary Topic
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Car-Following Safety Evolution in Mixed-Driving Environment: A Resilience Perspective

Huansong Zhang, Qikai Qu, Qiong Bao, Tianyuan Han et al.
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
article

Analysis of Car-Following Safety Evolution in Mixed-Driving Environment: A Resilience Perspective

Huansong Zhang, Qikai Qu, Qiong Bao, Tianyuan Han, Miaomiao Yang
article en

Abstract

As autonomous-driving technology advances, autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) are expected to coexist for an extended period. While resilience is widely applied in macro safety analysis, its application in micro-process modeling remains underdeveloped. This study proposes a resilience-based framework comprising three phases (initial, safety decay, safety recovery) to investigate the evolution of driving risk across three car-following scenarios: HV–HV (HV following HV), HV–AV (HV following AV), and AV–HV (AV following HV). The analytical framework consists of three steps: First, car-following pairs with complete risk-evolution processes were identified. Second, cluster analysis was applied to categorize phase-specific patterns. Third, the association rule mining algorithm was used to trace risk-evolution chains, followed by a comprehensive evaluation integrating safety and efficiency. Key findings include: (1) significant and rapid safety decay being accompanied by swift recovery, and the following vehicle exhibiting significant feature differences across recovery patterns; (2) safety decay in HV–AV being slower than that in HV–HV, with HV–AV demonstrating a close and conservative driving strategy during the risk-evolution process, with HV–AV meanwhile performing worse in safety and efficiency compared with HV–HV, highlighting the interaction discordance between HV and AV; (3) excessive deceleration of HV being the primary trigger for safety degradation in AV–HV, and AV demonstrating effective adaptation to safety decay, promoting slight safety reduction with rapid recovery, thereby balancing safety and efficiency. These findings reveal principles of risk evolution in mixed-driving environments, providing a novel analytical framework for mixed-driving safety.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
The University of Melbourne (AU), Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.