First‐Line Benzodiazepine Treatment for Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is a life‐threatening neurological emergency that requires prompt intervention. While several benzodiazepines are available as first‐line treatments, the optimal choice among them remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of these benzodiazepines for CSE. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi. We included randomized controlled trials involving adult patients with CSE who received benzodiazepines as first‐line treatment. Prehospital studies were also considered eligible. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted relevant data. The outcomes were seizure termination, mortality, intubation, favorable neurological outcomes, seizure recurrence, and duration of hospitalization. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random‐effects model with inverse variance weighting. Among 3478 studies screened, three randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria: two comparing intravenous lorazepam with intravenous diazepam, and one comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous lorazepam. Intravenous lorazepam was associated with a higher seizure termination rate (RR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03–1.49) to intravenous diazepam without an increase in adverse outcomes. Similarly, intramuscular midazolam was associated with higher seizure termination rates than intravenous lorazepam in prehospital settings (RR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06–1.27). The present study demonstrated that intravenous lorazepam is more effective than intravenous diazepam. Furthermore, intramuscular midazolam may be more associated with higher seizure termination rates than intravenous lorazepam. Further evidence is needed to clarify the efficacy of intravenous lorazepam and both intravenous and intramuscular midazolam in adult patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ncn3.70104
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

First‐Line Benzodiazepine Treatment for Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Soichiro Matsubara, Hitoshi Kobata, Shoji Yokobori, Hidetoshi Nakamoto et al.
Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

First‐Line Benzodiazepine Treatment for Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Soichiro Matsubara, Hitoshi Kobata, Shoji Yokobori, Hidetoshi Nakamoto, Hideto Yasuda, Eisei Hoshiyama, Masatoshi Uchida, Hajime Yoshimura, Ryuta Nakae
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is a life‐threatening neurological emergency that requires prompt intervention. While several benzodiazepines are available as first‐line treatments, the optimal choice among them remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of these benzodiazepines for CSE. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi. We included randomized controlled trials involving adult patients with CSE who received benzodiazepines as first‐line treatment. Prehospital studies were also considered eligible. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted relevant data. The outcomes were seizure termination, mortality, intubation, favorable neurological outcomes, seizure recurrence, and duration of hospitalization. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random‐effects model with inverse variance weighting. Among 3478 studies screened, three randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria: two comparing intravenous lorazepam with intravenous diazepam, and one comparing intramuscular midazolam with intravenous lorazepam. Intravenous lorazepam was associated with a higher seizure termination rate (RR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03–1.49) to intravenous diazepam without an increase in adverse outcomes. Similarly, intramuscular midazolam was associated with higher seizure termination rates than intravenous lorazepam in prehospital settings (RR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06–1.27). The present study demonstrated that intravenous lorazepam is more effective than intravenous diazepam. Furthermore, intramuscular midazolam may be more associated with higher seizure termination rates than intravenous lorazepam. Further evidence is needed to clarify the efficacy of intravenous lorazepam and both intravenous and intramuscular midazolam in adult patients.

Neurology and Clinical NeuroscienceVol. 14(3)
Jichi Medical University (JP), Manipal University College Malaysia (MY), Kumamoto University Hospital (JP), Tane General Hospital (JP), Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital (JP), Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center (JP), Kobe University (JP), Dokkyo Medical University (JP), Nippon Medical School (JP)
Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.