Are feigning screens “competent to stand trial”? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test, Atypical Presentation Scales, and Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology.
Authors
Grant A. Blake (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7111-1651)
Nishant Krishnan
Janet Ruffles
James R. P. Ogloff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3137-5556)
Michael D. Trood (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1666-9107)
Are feigning screens “competent to stand trial”? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test, Atypical Presentation Scales, and Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology.
Grant A. Blake, Nishant Krishnan, Janet Ruffles, James R. P. Ogloff et al.
Journal
Law and Human Behavior
Topics
Child Abuse and Related Trauma
article
Are feigning screens “competent to stand trial”? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test, Atypical Presentation Scales, and Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology.
Grant A. Blake, Nishant Krishnan, Janet Ruffles, James R. P. Ogloff, Michael D. Trood
article en
Abstract
No abstract available for this paper.
Publication Tag
Law and Human Behavior
Institutions
Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Funders
Australian Government, Swinburne University of Technology