Comparative Outcomes of Consolidation Strategies After R‐ <scp>MVP</scp> Induction in Primary Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma of the Central Nervous System

BACKGROUND: The optimal consolidation strategy following high-dose methotrexate (MTX)-based induction in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. This study compared real-world outcomes of different consolidation modalities in patients responsive to rituximab, MTX, vincristine, and procarbazine (R-MVP) induction chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 296 newly diagnosed PCNSL patients treated with R-MVP between 2008 and 2023. Among 290 evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was assessed, and survival outcomes were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). RESULTS: The ORR was 89.7%, with 71.7% achieving complete response (CR) or complete response unconfirmed (CRu) and 17.9% partial response (PR). Of 260 responders, 190 received consolidation: WBRT (40.8%), ASCT (20.0%), or non-myelosuppressive chemotherapy (NMC; 12.3%). After a median follow-up of 45.3 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for responders were 65.8 (95% CI 50.7-80.8) and 84.6 months (95% CI 66.5-102.7), respectively. ASCT yielded the most favorable survival (median PFS not reached), followed by WBRT (70.8 months), whereas NMC and no-consolidation groups showed significantly inferior PFS (22.9 and 40.1 months, p < 0.001). OS showed a similar trend (p = 0.006). On multivariable analysis, elevated LDH and consolidation type were independent predictors of PFS, whereas age and consolidation type were significant prognostic factors for OS. In the PSM cohort (ASCT vs. WBRT, n = 52 each), median PFS was not reached for ASCT versus 90.0 months for WBRT (p = 0.050); OS was not reached versus 97.9 months (p = 0.160). CONCLUSIONS: ASCT was associated with the most durable survival among consolidation strategies after R-MVP induction. These findings, derived from a large real-world, multi-institutional cohort, support ASCT as the preferred consolidation for eligible patients while underscoring the heterogeneity of current practice and the need for prospective validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71806
Primary Topic
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Outcomes of Consolidation Strategies After R‐ MVP Induction in Primary Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma of the Central Nervous System

Keun‐Yong Eom, Chae‐Yong Kim, Sang‐A Kim, Tae Min Kim et al.
Cancer Medicine
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Comparative Outcomes of Consolidation Strategies After R‐ MVP Induction in Primary Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma of the Central Nervous System

Keun‐Yong Eom, Chae‐Yong Kim, Sang‐A Kim, Tae Min Kim, Chul‐Kee Park, Kim J, Dae Seog Heo, Ji Yun Lee, Joo Ho Lee, Jeong‐Ok Lee
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal consolidation strategy following high-dose methotrexate (MTX)-based induction in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. This study compared real-world outcomes of different consolidation modalities in patients responsive to rituximab, MTX, vincristine, and procarbazine (R-MVP) induction chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 296 newly diagnosed PCNSL patients treated with R-MVP between 2008 and 2023. Among 290 evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was assessed, and survival outcomes were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). RESULTS: The ORR was 89.7%, with 71.7% achieving complete response (CR) or complete response unconfirmed (CRu) and 17.9% partial response (PR). Of 260 responders, 190 received consolidation: WBRT (40.8%), ASCT (20.0%), or non-myelosuppressive chemotherapy (NMC; 12.3%). After a median follow-up of 45.3 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for responders were 65.8 (95% CI 50.7-80.8) and 84.6 months (95% CI 66.5-102.7), respectively. ASCT yielded the most favorable survival (median PFS not reached), followed by WBRT (70.8 months), whereas NMC and no-consolidation groups showed significantly inferior PFS (22.9 and 40.1 months, p < 0.001). OS showed a similar trend (p = 0.006). On multivariable analysis, elevated LDH and consolidation type were independent predictors of PFS, whereas age and consolidation type were significant prognostic factors for OS. In the PSM cohort (ASCT vs. WBRT, n = 52 each), median PFS was not reached for ASCT versus 90.0 months for WBRT (p = 0.050); OS was not reached versus 97.9 months (p = 0.160). CONCLUSIONS: ASCT was associated with the most durable survival among consolidation strategies after R-MVP induction. These findings, derived from a large real-world, multi-institutional cohort, support ASCT as the preferred consolidation for eligible patients while underscoring the heterogeneity of current practice and the need for prospective validation.

Cancer MedicineVol. 15(4)
Seoul National University Hospital (KR), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), CHA University Bundang Medical Center (KR)
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.