Malpractice claims for pancreatic cancer in Norway: claim-rates, injury domains, claim outcomes and indemnity compensation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pancreatic cancer is difficult to diagnose early and at a curative stage, yet little is known about errors in management. The aim of the study was to investigate malpractice claims in Norway. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All malpractice claims filed to the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation between 2015 and 2024 for pancreatic cancer were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 148 claims (median 15 [range 8-20] claims/year) were filed among 9548 patients with pancreatic cancer, for an average claim rate of 1.55% (1 claim per every 65 pancreatic cancers). Most claims were filed against hospital/specialists (n = 90), followed by general practitioners (n = 49) with nine claims towards private practice contractors (P < 0.001). A total of 33 claims (22.3%) were approved, of which 28 (85%) concerned delayed diagnosis. Radiology was involved in 18 of the 33 approvals. According to caretaker-level for the malpractice claim, approved claims were 23% for hospital-claims, with lowest approval-rate against general practitioners (12%), and highest against private contractors (66%). Median delay in diagnosis was estimated at 6 months. The outcome of the error was 'death' in 16 of 33. Prognostic loss was determined in five of 33 patients, while 12 patients had no prognostic loss despite an approved claim. Caretaker-level did not differ regarding death or prognostic loss in claims (P = 0.203). A total of 1.47 million EUR was paid in indemnity payments. INTERPRETATION: The claim rate of 1.5% was stable, with about one in five claims approved. Diagnostic delay was the predominant cause, with several stakeholders involved across the healthcare system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Oncologica
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/ao.v65.45500
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Malpractice claims for pancreatic cancer in Norway: claim-rates, injury domains, claim outcomes and indemnity compensation

Annbjørg Hegelstad Søreide, Kjetil Søreide, Andreas Bremset Alvestad, Solveig Hodne et al.
Acta Oncologica
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
article

Malpractice claims for pancreatic cancer in Norway: claim-rates, injury domains, claim outcomes and indemnity compensation

Annbjørg Hegelstad Søreide, Kjetil Søreide, Andreas Bremset Alvestad, Solveig Hodne, Karin H. Edland
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pancreatic cancer is difficult to diagnose early and at a curative stage, yet little is known about errors in management. The aim of the study was to investigate malpractice claims in Norway. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All malpractice claims filed to the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation between 2015 and 2024 for pancreatic cancer were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 148 claims (median 15 [range 8-20] claims/year) were filed among 9548 patients with pancreatic cancer, for an average claim rate of 1.55% (1 claim per every 65 pancreatic cancers). Most claims were filed against hospital/specialists (n = 90), followed by general practitioners (n = 49) with nine claims towards private practice contractors (P < 0.001). A total of 33 claims (22.3%) were approved, of which 28 (85%) concerned delayed diagnosis. Radiology was involved in 18 of the 33 approvals. According to caretaker-level for the malpractice claim, approved claims were 23% for hospital-claims, with lowest approval-rate against general practitioners (12%), and highest against private contractors (66%). Median delay in diagnosis was estimated at 6 months. The outcome of the error was 'death' in 16 of 33. Prognostic loss was determined in five of 33 patients, while 12 patients had no prognostic loss despite an approved claim. Caretaker-level did not differ regarding death or prognostic loss in claims (P = 0.203). A total of 1.47 million EUR was paid in indemnity payments. INTERPRETATION: The claim rate of 1.5% was stable, with about one in five claims approved. Diagnostic delay was the predominant cause, with several stakeholders involved across the healthcare system.

Acta OncologicaVol. 65
Stavanger University Hospital (NO), Rogaland Training & Education Centre (NO), University of Stavanger (NO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.