Cellular Characterization Using Microwave‐Assisted Immunocytochemistry, A Time‐Efficient Alternative to Traditional Immunocytochemistry

Immunocytochemistry (ICC) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are related but separate techniques used for cell and tissue characterization. ICC involves immunolabeling of cells, and IHC immunolabeling of tissues; thus, the main difference is sample thickness. However, the distinction between ICC and IHC is not always clear and can be confusing. We show that a clear distinction should be made between the two. Importantly, we show that assisted ICC is an excellent method for characterizing cell lines. It is quick, reduces background noise without disrupting the expression and organization of the protein of interest, and helps ensure the rigor and reproducibility of results. © 2026 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Culture of blood-spinal cord barrier and neurovascular unit cellular components Basic Protocol 2: Immunocytochemistry assisted by PELCO BioWave® Pro (Fig. 3) Alternate Protocol: Conventional immunocytochemistry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Protocols
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpz1.70363
Primary Topic
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cellular Characterization Using Microwave‐Assisted Immunocytochemistry, A Time‐Efficient Alternative to Traditional Immunocytochemistry

Eduardo Rosa‐Molinar, Irma Torres‐Vazquez, Noraida Martínez-Rivera, Aidyn M. Medina‐López
Current Protocols
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
article

Cellular Characterization Using Microwave‐Assisted Immunocytochemistry, A Time‐Efficient Alternative to Traditional Immunocytochemistry

Eduardo Rosa‐Molinar, Irma Torres‐Vazquez, Noraida Martínez-Rivera, Aidyn M. Medina‐López
article en

Abstract

Immunocytochemistry (ICC) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are related but separate techniques used for cell and tissue characterization. ICC involves immunolabeling of cells, and IHC immunolabeling of tissues; thus, the main difference is sample thickness. However, the distinction between ICC and IHC is not always clear and can be confusing. We show that a clear distinction should be made between the two. Importantly, we show that assisted ICC is an excellent method for characterizing cell lines. It is quick, reduces background noise without disrupting the expression and organization of the protein of interest, and helps ensure the rigor and reproducibility of results. © 2026 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Culture of blood-spinal cord barrier and neurovascular unit cellular components Basic Protocol 2: Immunocytochemistry assisted by PELCO BioWave® Pro (Fig. 3) Alternate Protocol: Conventional immunocytochemistry.

Current ProtocolsVol. 6(4)
University of Kansas (US), University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras (PR), Washington University in St. Louis (US), ProQuest (United States) (US), Cleveland University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.