Can’t See Nature for the Trees: A Literature Review about Virtual Nature for Well-Being

Human well-being is inseparable from environmental context, with nature long recognized for its restorative potential. As everyday life becomes increasingly mediated by technology, access to nature is reconfigured through digital media. Virtual nature is often proposed as a tool for supporting well-being, yet the assumptions guiding its design and evaluation remain under-examined. This paper presents a systematic review of 124 empirical studies on virtual nature and well-being. Results generally trend toward clear positive effects on well-being; however, the current state-of-the-art remains considerably limited. Research is dominated by short-term, passive interventions grounded in stress reduction and attention restoration theories, prioritizing affective and physiological outcomes over cognitive or relational dimensions. We conclude by outlining four design inspirations that reposition virtual nature within HCI, shifting attention from short-term relief toward more diverse forms of human–nature interaction including cultural, participatory, and more-than-human perspectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3790367
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can’t See Nature for the Trees: A Literature Review about Virtual Nature for Well-Being

Henri Pirkkalainen, Bakhtawar Khan, Juho Hamari, Velvet Spors et al.
1 citations
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Can’t See Nature for the Trees: A Literature Review about Virtual Nature for Well-Being

Henri Pirkkalainen, Bakhtawar Khan, Juho Hamari, Velvet Spors, Alfie Cameron
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Human well-being is inseparable from environmental context, with nature long recognized for its restorative potential. As everyday life becomes increasingly mediated by technology, access to nature is reconfigured through digital media. Virtual nature is often proposed as a tool for supporting well-being, yet the assumptions guiding its design and evaluation remain under-examined. This paper presents a systematic review of 124 empirical studies on virtual nature and well-being. Results generally trend toward clear positive effects on well-being; however, the current state-of-the-art remains considerably limited. Research is dominated by short-term, passive interventions grounded in stress reduction and attention restoration theories, prioritizing affective and physiological outcomes over cognitive or relational dimensions. We conclude by outlining four design inspirations that reposition virtual nature within HCI, shifting attention from short-term relief toward more diverse forms of human–nature interaction including cultural, participatory, and more-than-human perspectives.

University of Nottingham (GB), Tampere University of Applied Sciences (FI), Tampere University (FI), Tampere University (FI), University of Tartu (EE)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can’t See Nature for the Trees: A Literature Review about Virtual Nature for Well-Being — Henri Pirkkalainen, Bakhtawar Khan, et al. · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS