Argo AI Testing Protocol: Sustained Multi Axis Load Testing

Most evaluation of conversational AI relies on short, prompt‑based tests that fail to reflect how real people use these systems in real and diverse situations. Such tests do not capture the demands of extended interaction, shifting user intent, or the cumulative effects of cognitive and emotional input over time. This paper introduces the Argo AI Testing Protocol (the Argo Protocol), a structured approach for evaluating AI systems within the User Interaction Space -the full set of observable outputs and interactions available to a user. The Protocol proposes Sustained Multi‑Axis Load Testing, a method for applying controlled stress across multiple vectors simultaneously: interactions extended across time, increasing cognitive complexity, the user’s emotional input, the model’s pattern‑state stability, the computational resources available to the model, and the time allowed for each response. Rather than prescribing fixed procedures, durations, or compliance requirements, the Argo Protocol provides a conceptual framework and diagnostic vocabulary that developers can adapt to their own models, environments, and constraints. The aim here is not to define a standard, but the Protocol may serve as a starting point for one should the field require a formalised approach in the future. The evaluation is grounded in the observable behaviour of the User Interaction Space. Under sustained, multi‑axis load- the Argo Protocol suggests a viable route for reproducible, real‑world testing that better reflects how AI systems are actually used by real people.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19560325
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Argo AI Testing Protocol: Sustained Multi Axis Load Testing

William Argo
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Argo AI Testing Protocol: Sustained Multi Axis Load Testing

William Argo
article en

Abstract

Most evaluation of conversational AI relies on short, prompt‑based tests that fail to reflect how real people use these systems in real and diverse situations. Such tests do not capture the demands of extended interaction, shifting user intent, or the cumulative effects of cognitive and emotional input over time. This paper introduces the Argo AI Testing Protocol (the Argo Protocol), a structured approach for evaluating AI systems within the User Interaction Space -the full set of observable outputs and interactions available to a user. The Protocol proposes Sustained Multi‑Axis Load Testing, a method for applying controlled stress across multiple vectors simultaneously: interactions extended across time, increasing cognitive complexity, the user’s emotional input, the model’s pattern‑state stability, the computational resources available to the model, and the time allowed for each response. Rather than prescribing fixed procedures, durations, or compliance requirements, the Argo Protocol provides a conceptual framework and diagnostic vocabulary that developers can adapt to their own models, environments, and constraints. The aim here is not to define a standard, but the Protocol may serve as a starting point for one should the field require a formalised approach in the future. The evaluation is grounded in the observable behaviour of the User Interaction Space. Under sustained, multi‑axis load- the Argo Protocol suggests a viable route for reproducible, real‑world testing that better reflects how AI systems are actually used by real people.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.