The current state of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the UK: a nationwide cross-sectional survey

Abstract Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of early gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasia, but its adoption in Western countries has been limited by training and service constraints. This study aimed to describe the current landscape of ESD in the UK. Methods A nationwide, cross-sectional, anonymised online survey was conducted among UK endoscopists independently performing either upper and/or lower GI ESD. Results Twenty-eight responses were analysed. Most respondents were gastroenterologists (79%) and male (82%). Responses were received from across the UK, with the largest proportions from Greater London (39%) and the South East (18%). Overall, 68% had completed an advanced fellowship (commonly in the UK or Japan), and 82% had attended accredited ESD courses, often on multiple occasions. Across all ESD sites, only a minority perform more than 20 procedures annually, with high-volume practice largely confined to rectal ESD. Narrow Band Imaging (93%) and white light endoscopy (86%) were the most commonly used delineation methods; colloid-based solutions (75%), epinephrine (82%), and blue dye (100%) were widely used for submucosal injection. Most respondents routinely used tunnelling (93%) and traction-assisted techniques (82%). General anaesthesia was preferred for upper GI ESD (82%), and conscious sedation for lower GI ESD (46%). Reported barriers to training included heavy workload (37%), low caseload (26%), and limited institutional support (19%). Nearly all respondents (93%) believed robotics has a future role in ESD. Conclusions Independent ESD practice in the UK is delivered by a small workforce, with heterogeneous training backgrounds and procedural volumes often below recommended thresholds. National strategies for structured training, centralisation, and coordinated service planning are needed to support safe and sustainable expansion of ESD. Graphical abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-12596-w
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The current state of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the UK: a nationwide cross-sectional survey

Mark Runciman, Said Alyacoubi, George P. Mylonas, Christopher John Peters et al.
Surgical Endoscopy
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

The current state of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the UK: a nationwide cross-sectional survey

Mark Runciman, Said Alyacoubi, George P. Mylonas, Christopher John Peters, Ara Darzi, Nisha Patel, Sung Pil Hong, Amyn Haji
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of early gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasia, but its adoption in Western countries has been limited by training and service constraints. This study aimed to describe the current landscape of ESD in the UK. Methods A nationwide, cross-sectional, anonymised online survey was conducted among UK endoscopists independently performing either upper and/or lower GI ESD. Results Twenty-eight responses were analysed. Most respondents were gastroenterologists (79%) and male (82%). Responses were received from across the UK, with the largest proportions from Greater London (39%) and the South East (18%). Overall, 68% had completed an advanced fellowship (commonly in the UK or Japan), and 82% had attended accredited ESD courses, often on multiple occasions. Across all ESD sites, only a minority perform more than 20 procedures annually, with high-volume practice largely confined to rectal ESD. Narrow Band Imaging (93%) and white light endoscopy (86%) were the most commonly used delineation methods; colloid-based solutions (75%), epinephrine (82%), and blue dye (100%) were widely used for submucosal injection. Most respondents routinely used tunnelling (93%) and traction-assisted techniques (82%). General anaesthesia was preferred for upper GI ESD (82%), and conscious sedation for lower GI ESD (46%). Reported barriers to training included heavy workload (37%), low caseload (26%), and limited institutional support (19%). Nearly all respondents (93%) believed robotics has a future role in ESD. Conclusions Independent ESD practice in the UK is delivered by a small workforce, with heterogeneous training backgrounds and procedural volumes often below recommended thresholds. National strategies for structured training, centralisation, and coordinated service planning are needed to support safe and sustainable expansion of ESD. Graphical abstract

Surgical Endoscopy
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland, NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.