Digital Imaging Technologies for Forensic Orofacial Identification: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda

This systematic review critically examines the use of 2D and 3D digital imaging technologies of the face and teeth, with and without integration of artificial intelligence, for human identification in forensic and medicolegal contexts. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science were systematically searched, identifying 26 studies published between 2011 and 2025 that met predefined eligibility criteria framed by a PECO-style question. Eighteen studies focused on facial imaging, six on dental imaging and two on integrated orofacial workflows, using digital photography, CCTV/video, 3D surface imaging, intraoral scanners, and three-dimensional superimposition methods, sometimes combined with classical algorithms and deep learning models. In controlled or semi-controlled settings, state-of-the-art facial algorithms often reported very high accuracy, with values up to 99.85%. By contrast, studies using real CCTV or other challenging forensic imagery showed more variable performance, with accuracies ranging from about 72.8% to 96.6%. Dental and orofacial studies reported 100% correct identifications for 3D superimposition of intraoral scans in small samples, and around 83% accuracy for automated AI-based dental identification. Crucially, fulfilling the promise of a true orofacial approach, this review proposes a structured research agenda focused on creating realistic multi-modal databases, standardizing protocols, and implementing probabilistic reporting (likelihood ratios) to guide future validation and legal admissibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083766
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Imaging Technologies for Forensic Orofacial Identification: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda

João Mendes de Abreu, Sofía Viegas, Ana Côrte-Real, Tiago Nunes et al.
Applied Sciences
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
article

Digital Imaging Technologies for Forensic Orofacial Identification: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda

João Mendes de Abreu, Sofía Viegas, Ana Côrte-Real, Tiago Nunes, Rodrigo Azenha-Gomes
article en

Abstract

This systematic review critically examines the use of 2D and 3D digital imaging technologies of the face and teeth, with and without integration of artificial intelligence, for human identification in forensic and medicolegal contexts. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science were systematically searched, identifying 26 studies published between 2011 and 2025 that met predefined eligibility criteria framed by a PECO-style question. Eighteen studies focused on facial imaging, six on dental imaging and two on integrated orofacial workflows, using digital photography, CCTV/video, 3D surface imaging, intraoral scanners, and three-dimensional superimposition methods, sometimes combined with classical algorithms and deep learning models. In controlled or semi-controlled settings, state-of-the-art facial algorithms often reported very high accuracy, with values up to 99.85%. By contrast, studies using real CCTV or other challenging forensic imagery showed more variable performance, with accuracies ranging from about 72.8% to 96.6%. Dental and orofacial studies reported 100% correct identifications for 3D superimposition of intraoral scans in small samples, and around 83% accuracy for automated AI-based dental identification. Crucially, fulfilling the promise of a true orofacial approach, this review proposes a structured research agenda focused on creating realistic multi-modal databases, standardizing protocols, and implementing probabilistic reporting (likelihood ratios) to guide future validation and legal admissibility.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(8)
University of Coimbra (PT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital Imaging Technologies for Forensic Orofacial Identification: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda — João Mendes de Abreu, Sofía Viegas, et al. · Applied Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS