An Empirical Study of Structured Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly transformed artificial intelligence by enabling advanced reasoning, natural language understanding, and content generation. While architectural advancements and large-scale datasets contribute to their effectiveness, prompt engineering has emerged as a critical factor influencing output quality and reliabilityThis study presents a structured empirical evaluation of five prompting strategies: unstructured, role-based, chain-of-thought (CoT), instructional, and constraint-based prompting. The findings indicate that structured prompting techniques improve accuracy by up to 35% in reasoning-intensive tasks and significantly reduce hallucinations. Key Contributions: Development of a structured evaluation framework for prompt strategies. Comparative analysis across multiple task domains. Quantitative assessment of reasoning and safety improvements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19556220
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Empirical Study of Structured Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models

Gopal R, Benny Jabez
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Topic Modeling
article

An Empirical Study of Structured Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models

Gopal R, Benny Jabez
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly transformed artificial intelligence by enabling advanced reasoning, natural language understanding, and content generation. While architectural advancements and large-scale datasets contribute to their effectiveness, prompt engineering has emerged as a critical factor influencing output quality and reliabilityThis study presents a structured empirical evaluation of five prompting strategies: unstructured, role-based, chain-of-thought (CoT), instructional, and constraint-based prompting. The findings indicate that structured prompting techniques improve accuracy by up to 35% in reasoning-intensive tasks and significantly reduce hallucinations. Key Contributions: Development of a structured evaluation framework for prompt strategies. Comparative analysis across multiple task domains. Quantitative assessment of reasoning and safety improvements.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Amity University (AE), Maine Classical Association (US), Marymount University (US), Bangalore University (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.