Community in Context: The Effect of the Local Community on the Experience of Community

ABSTRACT To what extent does community context shape individuals' experience of community? This study replicates and extends Flaherty and Brown's multilevel application of Kasarda and Janowitz’ systemic model using four separate multilevel datasets and multiple measures of community experience. The results reaffirm Flaherty and Brown's findings and support the systemic model by showing that community attachment varies little across communities and is primarily explained by individual‐level variables. In contrast, psychological sense of community appears to vary more substantially between communities and may provide a more nuanced and effective way to assess community experience. The authors urge community sociologists to reflect on the original rationale for using community attachment and to consider the theoretical implications of its limited variance between communities—despite its longstanding use as a key community‐level social indicator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rural Sociology
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70044
Primary Topic
Community Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community in Context: The Effect of the Local Community on the Experience of Community

Jeremy Flaherty, Michael R. Cope
Rural Sociology
Community Health and Development
article

Community in Context: The Effect of the Local Community on the Experience of Community

Jeremy Flaherty, Michael R. Cope
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT To what extent does community context shape individuals' experience of community? This study replicates and extends Flaherty and Brown's multilevel application of Kasarda and Janowitz’ systemic model using four separate multilevel datasets and multiple measures of community experience. The results reaffirm Flaherty and Brown's findings and support the systemic model by showing that community attachment varies little across communities and is primarily explained by individual‐level variables. In contrast, psychological sense of community appears to vary more substantially between communities and may provide a more nuanced and effective way to assess community experience. The authors urge community sociologists to reflect on the original rationale for using community attachment and to consider the theoretical implications of its limited variance between communities—despite its longstanding use as a key community‐level social indicator.

Rural SociologyVol. 91(2)
Brigham Young University (US), Collège Jean-de-Brébeuf (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Community Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.